17561Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Vitromed GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark VITROMED Germany – International registration of the earlier figurative mark VITROMED – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-514/22.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17562Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#International British Education XXI SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark IBE ST. GEORGE’S – Earlier national figurative mark ST. GEORGE’S SCHOOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-438/22.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17563Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#International British Education XXI SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark IBE ST. GEORGE’S – Earlier national figurative mark ST. GEORGE’S SCHOOL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-438/22.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17564Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Rauch Furnace Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a melting crucible – Prior design – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – No different overall impression – Disclosure of prior design – Articles 6, 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Evidence filed in a language other than the language of the proceedings – Article 29(1) and (5), and Article 81(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Facts or evidence relied on for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-347/22.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17565Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Rauch Furnace Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a melting crucible – Prior design – Ground for invalidity – Lack of individual character – No different overall impression – Disclosure of prior design – Articles 6, 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Evidence filed in a language other than the language of the proceedings – Article 29(1) and (5), and Article 81(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Facts or evidence relied on for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-347/22.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17566Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative marks InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima – Earlier EU and national word marks EVAX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-197/22 and T-198/22.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17567Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative marks InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima – Earlier EU and national word marks EVAX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Joined Cases T-197/22 and T-198/22.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17568Case T-628/22: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Repasi v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 — Taxonomy — Economic activities relating to fossil gas and nuclear energy — Inclusion in sustainable economic activities — Member of the European Parliament — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17569Case T-514/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Vitromed v EUIPO — Vitromed Healthcare (VITROMED Germany) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark VITROMED Germany — International registration of the earlier figurative mark VITROMED — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17570Case T-438/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — International British Education XXI v EUIPO — Saint George’s School (IBE ST. GEORGE’S) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark IBE ST. GEORGE’S — Earlier national figurative mark ST. GEORGE’S SCHOOL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17571Case T-347/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Rauch Furnace Technology v EUIPO — Musto et Bureau (melting crucible) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Community design representing a melting crucible — Prior design — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — No different overall impression — Disclosure of prior design — Articles 6, 7 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Evidence filed in a language other than the language of the proceedings — Article 29(1) and (5), and Article 81(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — Facts or evidence relied on for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Article 63 of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17572Joined Cases T-197/22 and T-198/22: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Ioulia and Irene Tseti Pharmaceutical Laboratories v EUIPO — Arbora & Ausonia (InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative marks InterMed Pharmaceutical Laboratories eva intima — Earlier EU and national word marks EVAX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17573Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in China to imports of certain aluminium foil consigned from Thailand – Anti-circumvention investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sufficient evidence – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-748/21.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17574Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in China to imports of certain aluminium foil consigned from Thailand – Anti-circumvention investigation – Circumvention – Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sufficient evidence – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-748/21.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17575Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Importation of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Definition of the product concerned – Determination of the normal value – Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Report finding significant distortions in the exporting country – Burden of proof – Use of a representative country – Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury – Economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration.#Case T-326/21.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17576Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 June 2023 (Extracts).#Guangdong Haomei New Materials Co. Ltd and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Importation of aluminium extrusions originating in China – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Definition of the product concerned – Determination of the normal value – Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Report finding significant distortions in the exporting country – Burden of proof – Use of a representative country – Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury – Economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration.#Case T-326/21.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17577Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Madeira Free Zone – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Meaning of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration – Absolute impossibility of implementation – Limitation – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-131/21.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17578Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2023.#Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Madeira Free Zone – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Meaning of ‘State aid’ – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration – Absolute impossibility of implementation – Limitation – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-131/21.cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17579Case T-748/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group and Others v Commission (Dumping — Extension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in China to imports of certain aluminium foil consigned from Thailand — Anti-circumvention investigation — Circumvention — Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Sufficient evidence — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023
17580Case T-326/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2023 — Guangdong Haomei New Materials and Guangdong King Metal Light Alloy Technology v Commission (Dumping — Import of aluminium extrusions originating in China — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/546 — Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Definition of the product concerned — Determination of the normal value — Article 2(6a) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Report establishing significant distortions in the exporting country — Burden of proof — Reference to a representative country — Article 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Injury — Economic factors and incices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration)cjeu_case · 21 juin 2023