Catalogue des documents juridiques

104314 documents
1661

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA contre Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/20/CE – Article 13 – Redevances pour les droits d’utilisation des fréquences de la télévision numérique – Directive 2002/21/CE – Article 8 – Objectifs généraux – Proportionnalité – Critère d’évaluation des redevances lié à la perception d’un montant prédéterminé de recettes annuelles ayant un objectif de nature financière.#Affaire C-10/25.

cjeu_case ·
1662

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fees for rights of use for digital television frequencies – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 8 – General objectives – Proportionality – Criterion for assessing fees linked to the collection of a predetermined amount of annual revenue with a financial objective.#Case C-10/25.

cjeu_case ·
1668

Case C-561/25, Allianz Bulgaria Zhivot: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – BF v ZAD Allianz Bulgaria Zhivot (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient detail – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
1669

Case C-10/25, Elettronica Industriale: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio – Italy) – Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/20/EC – Article 13 – Fees for rights of use for digital television frequencies – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 8 – General objectives – Proportionality – Criterion for assessing fees linked to the collection of a predetermined amount of annual revenue with a financial objective)

cjeu_case ·
1672

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Erdrich Umformtechnik GmbH v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of taxation applicable to interest and royalty payments made between associated companies of different Member States – Directive 2003/49/EC – Decision to grant an exemption for a period prior to the provision of the attestation and supporting information – Article 1(12) – Time limit for provision of the attestation – Limitation on the period that may be subject to an exemption.#Case C-828/24.

cjeu_case ·
1673

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#SG contre Gemeinde Wien.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Directive 2000/78/CE – Interdiction de discrimination fondée sur l’âge – Réglementation régionale relative à la rémunération des agents contractuels – Prise en compte des périodes d’emploi accomplies avant l’âge de 18 ans – Nouveau régime de rémunération remplaçant une réglementation antérieure déclarée discriminatoire.#Affaire C-757/24.

cjeu_case ·
1674

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#SG v Gemeinde Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Regional legislation on the remuneration of contract staff members – Periods of employment completed before the age of 18 taken into account – New remuneration system replacing previous legislation found to be discriminatory.#Case C-757/24.

cjeu_case ·
1675

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Manquement d’État – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Environnement – Directive 92/43/CEE – Faune et flore sauvages – Conservation des habitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages – Article 4, paragraphe 4 – Annexes I et II – Sites d’importance communautaire – Zones spéciales de conservation – Absence de désignation – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Mesures de conservation nécessaires – Absence d’adoption – Inexécution de l’arrêt de la Cour – Sanctions pécuniaires – Somme forfaitaire – Astreinte.#Affaire C-613/24.

cjeu_case ·
1677

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Eisenberger Gerüstbau GmbH v JK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Distance contract concluded between a consumer and a trader – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Contact established between the consumer and the trader by another trader commissioned by the consumer – Article 2(7) – Right of withdrawal of the consumer – Article 9(1) – Abuse of rights.#Case C-564/24.

cjeu_case ·
1678

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Eisenberger Gerüstbau GmbH v JK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Distance contract concluded between a consumer and a trader – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Contact established between the consumer and the trader by another trader commissioned by the consumer – Article 2(7) – Right of withdrawal of the consumer – Article 9(1) – Abuse of rights.#Case C-564/24.

cjeu_case ·
1679

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid contre X.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile – Directive 2013/32/UE – Article 31, paragraphe 3, troisième alinéa, sous b) – Procédures pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Possibilité de prolonger le délai de décision de six mois en cas d’un grand nombre de demandes de protection internationale déposées simultanément – Décisions de prolongation successives – Conditions et limites – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Obligation, pour les États membres, de veiller à ce que l’autorité responsable de la détermination dispose des moyens appropriés pour accomplir ses tâches.#Affaire C-489/24.

cjeu_case ·
1680

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Possibility to extend the six-month time limit for taking a decision in the event of a large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Successive extension decisions – Conditions and limits – Article 4(1) – Obligation for Member States to ensure that the determining authority is provided with appropriate means to carry out its tasks.#Case C-489/24.

cjeu_case ·