Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
16449

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Prolactal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PROLACTAL – Earlier national figurative mark Prolàctea – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 and Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-549/22.

cjeu_case ·
16450

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Prolactal GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PROLACTAL – Earlier national figurative mark Prolàctea – Relative ground for refusal – Similarity of the signs – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 and Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-549/22.

cjeu_case ·
16453

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LΛΛVΛ – Earlier EU figurative marks LAV and Lav – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-473/22.

cjeu_case ·
16454

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LΛΛVΛ – Earlier EU figurative marks LAV and Lav – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-473/22.

cjeu_case ·
16455

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Korres AE - Fysika Proionta v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME – Earlier national word mark HYDRABIO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – First sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-328/22.

cjeu_case ·
16456

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Korres AE - Fysika Proionta v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark EST. KORRES 1996 HYDRA-BIOME – Earlier national word mark HYDRABIO – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – First sentence of Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-328/22.

cjeu_case ·
16457

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Ecoalf Recycled Fabrics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark BECAUSE THERE IS NO PLANET B – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment.#Case T-324/22.

cjeu_case ·
16458

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Ecoalf Recycled Fabrics, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark BECAUSE THERE IS NO PLANET B – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment.#Case T-324/22.

cjeu_case ·
16459

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Viktor Filippovich Rashnikov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Listing and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Notion of ‘leading businessperson’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-305/22.

cjeu_case ·
16460

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 September 2023.#Viktor Filippovich Rashnikov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Listing and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Notion of ‘leading businessperson’ – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-305/22.

cjeu_case ·