Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
15301

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#Contorno Textil, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark, representing a dachshund in profile, GILBERT TECKEL – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a dachshund in profile – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Legal certainty.#Case T-773/22.

cjeu_case ·
15302

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark HPU AND YOU – Earlier EU and national figurative marks representing three hexagons – Earlier EU figurative mark OLIMP – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Family of marks – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Case T-511/22.

cjeu_case ·
15303

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark HPU AND YOU – Earlier EU and national figurative marks representing three hexagons – Earlier EU figurative mark OLIMP – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Family of marks – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Case T-511/22.

cjeu_case ·
15304

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#QF v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-386/22.

cjeu_case ·
15305

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#QF v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-386/22.

cjeu_case ·
15310

Case T-773/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2023 — Contorno Textil v EUIPO — Harmont & Blaine (GILBERT TECKEL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark, representing a dachshund in profile, GILBERT TECKEL — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a dachshund in profile — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Equal treatment — Legal certainty)

cjeu_case ·
15311

Case T-511/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2023 — Olimp Laboratories v EUIPO — Schmitzer (HPU AND YOU) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark HPU AND YOU — Earlier EU and national figurative marks representing three hexagons — Earlier EU figurative mark OLIMP — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Family of marks — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty)

cjeu_case ·
15312

Case T-386/22: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2023 — QF v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in respect of Russia’s actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Concept of ‘association’ — Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
15315

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#SC Assofrutti Rom S.R.L v Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale and Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common Agricultural Policy – Financial support for investments in tree plantations – Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-635/22.

cjeu_case ·
15316

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#SC Assofrutti Rom S.R.L v Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale and Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common Agricultural Policy – Financial support for investments in tree plantations – Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-635/22.

cjeu_case ·
15317

Case C-635/22, Assofrutti Rom: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara — Romania) — SC Assofrutti Rom SRL v Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale, Centrul Regional pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale 5 Vest Timişoara (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common Agricultural Policy — Financial support for investments in tree plantations — Requirement to set out the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
15318

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board.#Arbitration clause – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Contracts concerning the irrevocable payment commitment and the collateral arrangements – Rejection of the request for return of collateral linked to ex ante contributions provided in the form of irrevocable payment commitments – Institution whose authorisation has been withdrawn – Article 7(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Non-contractual liability – Unjust enrichment.#Case T-688/21.

cjeu_case ·
15319

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 October 2023.#BNP Paribas Public Sector SA v Single Resolution Board.#Arbitration clause – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Contracts concerning the irrevocable payment commitment and the collateral arrangements – Rejection of the request for return of collateral linked to ex ante contributions provided in the form of irrevocable payment commitments – Institution whose authorisation has been withdrawn – Article 7(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Non-contractual liability – Unjust enrichment.#Case T-688/21.

cjeu_case ·