1481Case C-371/24, Comdribus: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris – France) – Criminal proceedings against HW (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating criminal offences – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 10 – Processing of special categories of personal data – Collection of biometric data – Taking of fingerprints and of photographs – Person reasonably suspected on one or more grounds of having committed or attempted to commit a criminal offence – Whether strictly necessary – Discretion – Obligation to state reasons – Refusal of the data subject to consent to the collection of his or her biometric data – National legislation allowing a person to be prosecuted for and convicted of a specific criminal offence penalising such a refusal, even in the absence of any prosecution or conviction in respect of the criminal offence that formed the basis of the envisaged collection of those data)cjeu_case · March 18, 2026
1482Case C-363/24, Finansinspektionen: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen – Sweden) – Finansinspektionen v Carnegie Investment Bank AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Market abuse – Article 7(1) – Concept of inside information – Article 7(2) – Information of a precise nature – Email containing information relating to the inclusion of a person in an insider list – No statement of the reasons that led to that inclusion – Correct assessment of the circumstances – Correct information – Necessity)cjeu_case · March 18, 2026
1483Joined Cases C-178/24 P and C-179/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2026 – Mainova AG, enercity AG v European Commission (Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Concentration between undertakings – German electricity and gas markets – Acquisition by E.ON SE of the distribution and retail business of RWE AG – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992)cjeu_case · March 18, 2026
1484Joined Cases C-171/24 P to C-177/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2026 – EVH GmbH, Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH, TEAG Thüringer Energie AG, Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG, EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH, GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Concentration of undertakings – German electricity and gas markets – Acquisition by E.ON SE of RWE AG’s distribution and trade assets – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992)cjeu_case · March 18, 2026
1485Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” and Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK, en qualité d'héritier de TB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a ‘work’ – Protection of works by copyright – Conditions – Directive 2006/116/EC – Article 5 – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works – Article 2 – Critical edition of a pre-existing work the purpose of which is to restore a Latin manuscript – Intellectual creation reflecting the personality of its author, by expressing the latter’s free and creative choices – Subject matter identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity.#Case C-649/23.cjeu_case · March 18, 2026
1486Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” and Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK, en qualité d'héritier de TB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a ‘work’ – Protection of works by copyright – Conditions – Directive 2006/116/EC – Article 5 – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works – Article 2 – Critical edition of a pre-existing work the purpose of which is to restore a Latin manuscript – Intellectual creation reflecting the personality of its author, by expressing the latter’s free and creative choices – Subject matter identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity.#Case C-649/23.cjeu_case · March 18, 2026
1487Case C-649/23, Institutul G. Călinescu: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Romania) – Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară G. Călinescu, Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK, as heir of TB, VP, GR (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a work – Protection of works by copyright – Conditions – Directive 2006/116/EC – Article 5 – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works – Article 2 – Critical edition of a pre-existing work the purpose of which is to restore a Latin manuscript – Intellectual creation reflecting the personality of its author, by expressing the latter’s free and creative choices – Subject matter identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity)cjeu_case · March 18, 2026
1488Case T-255/26, OLT Express Germany: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) made on 18 March 2026 – Federal Republic of Germany v MC, acting as insolvency administrator of OLT Express Germany GmbHcjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1489Case T-253/26, Kohlenwasserstoff-Beförderung: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) made on 18 March 2026 – Hauptzollamt A v Kohlenwasserstoff-Beförderungcjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1490Case C-224/26, Flughafen Graz and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 18 March 2026 – Flughafen Graz Betriebs GmbH, Flughafen Graz Bodenservice GmbH and Airport Parking Graz GmbH v Republic of Austriacjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1491Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre, siégeant avec cinq juges) du 18 mars 2026.#R***** contre W***** H*****.#Radiation.#Affaire T-917/25.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1492Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 18 mars 2026.#Effeemme Srl contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de déchéance – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative Gattinoni – Absence d’usage sérieux de la marque – Article 18 et article 58, paragraphe 1, sous a), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-377/25.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1493Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Effeemme Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-377/25.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1494Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#MAN Truck & Bus SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark V12X – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Validity of evidence – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to property – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-108/25.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1495Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#MAN Truck & Bus SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-108/25.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1496Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 18 mars 2026.#Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale AOURA – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure AURA LOEWE – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Usage sérieux de la marque antérieure – Article 47, paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-77/25.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1497Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2026.#Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark AOURA – Earlier EU word mark AURA LOEWE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-77/25.cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1498Case T-917/25, Fewirth: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five judges) of 18 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg – Austria) – R***** v W***** H*****cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1499Case T-377/25: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Effeemme v EUIPO – Phoenix 1946 (Gattinoni) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Gattinoni – No genuine use of the mark – Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · March 17, 2026
1500Case T-108/25: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – MAN Truck & Bus v EUIPO – Rolls-Royce Power Systems (V12X) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark V12X – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Validity of evidence – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to property – Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)cjeu_case · March 17, 2026