Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
14361

Case T-113/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector — Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Manipulation of the Euribor Interbank Benchmark Rates — Exchange of confidential information — Restriction of competition by object — Single and continuous infringement — ‘Hybrid’ procedure staggered over time — Presumption of innocence — Impartiality — Fines — Basic amount — Value of sales — Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Obligation to state reasons — Amending decision supplementing the statement of reasons — Equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
14362

Case T-106/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — JPMorgan Chase and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Euro Interest Rate Derivatives sector — Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Manipulation of the Euribor Interbank Benchmark Rates — Exchange of confidential information — Restriction of competition by object — Single and continuous infringement — ‘Hybrid’ procedure staggered over time — Presumption of innocence — Impartiality — Fines — Basic amount — Value of sales — Article 23(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Obligation to state reasons — Amending decision supplementing the statement of reasons — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
14365

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2023.#Criminal proceedings against L.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply to questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-223/23.

cjeu_case ·
14373

Case C-223/23, Redu: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2023 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov — Romania) — criminal proceedings against L.D. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply to questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Requirement to state the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation — Lack of sufficient details — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
14378

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2023.#Proceedings brought by 'Eurobank Bulgaria' AD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Consumer protection – Unfair terms – Directive 93/13/EEC – Application by a seller or supplier concerning part of a debt based on a contract concluded with a consumer – Judgment granting the application and confirming the validity of the contract in its entirety – Subsequent proceedings concerning a different part of that debt – Res judicata.#Case C-231/23.

cjeu_case ·
14379

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2023.#Proceedings brought by 'Eurobank Bulgaria' AD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Consumer protection – Unfair terms – Directive 93/13/EEC – Application by a seller or supplier concerning part of a debt based on a contract concluded with a consumer – Judgment granting the application and confirming the validity of the contract in its entirety – Subsequent proceedings concerning a different part of that debt – Res judicata.#Case C-231/23.

cjeu_case ·