Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
13662

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 31 January 2024.#Symphony Environmental Technologies plc and Symphony Environmental Ltd v European Parliament and Others.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Directive (EU) 2019/904 – Prohibition on the placing on the market of products made from oxo-degradable plastic – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – No distinction between products made from oxo-degradable plastic and products made from oxo-biodegradable plastic – Impact assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Case T-745/20.

cjeu_case ·
13663

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 31 January 2024.#Symphony Environmental Technologies plc and Symphony Environmental Ltd v European Parliament and Others.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Directive (EU) 2019/904 – Prohibition on the placing on the market of products made from oxo-degradable plastic – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – No distinction between products made from oxo-degradable plastic and products made from oxo-biodegradable plastic – Impact assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Case T-745/20.

cjeu_case ·
13666

Case T-745/20: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2024 — Symphony Environmental Technologies and Symphony Environmental v Parliament and Others (Non-contractual liability — Environment — Directive (EU) 2019/904 — Prohibition on the placing on the market of products made from oxo-degradable plastic — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — No distinction between products made from oxo-degradable plastic and products made from oxo-biodegradable plastic — Impact assessment — Equal treatment — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
13678

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 January 2024.#Markus Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-614/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
13680

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NO v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Obligation imposed on a solicitor to transfer fees to a competitor – Decision of the European Commission finding that the measure in question does not constitute State aid – Action for annulment in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-522/23 P.

cjeu_case ·