Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
13631

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 1 February 2024.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine – Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-70/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
13632

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 1 February 2024.#Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Asociaţia 'Mişcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor' v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Article 19(1) TEU – Cooperation and Verification Mechanism – Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania – Fight against corruption – Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system – Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations – Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings.#Case C-53/23.

cjeu_case ·
13634

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 February 2024.#Scania AB and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Truck market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies required by Euro 3 to Euro 6 standards and the passing on of the costs of those technologies to customers – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of that infringement – ‘Hybrid procedure’ leading successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision at the end of a standard procedure – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to good administration – Impartiality of the European Commission – Assessment of the geographic scope of a concerted practice – Relevant evidence – Classification of a series of acts as a ‘single and continuous infringement’ – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Power of the Commission to impose a fine – Limitation.#Case C-251/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
13635

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 1 February 2024.#SC Adient Ltd & Co. Kg v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Argeş.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Argeş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 44 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 – Article 11(1) – Place of supply of services – Concept of a ‘fixed establishment’ – Ability, in terms of human and technical resources, to receive and use the services for its own needs – Services for the manufacture of car seat covers performed by one company on behalf of another company, belonging to the same group and established in another Member State’.#Case C-533/22.

cjeu_case ·
13637

Case C-251/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 February 2024 — Scania AB, Scania CV AB, Scania Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Truck market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) — Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies required by Euro 3 to Euro 6 standards and the passing on of the costs of those technologies to customers — Single and continuous infringement — Geographic scope of that infringement — ‘Hybrid procedure’ leading successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision at the end of a standard procedure — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to good administration — Impartiality of the European Commission — Assessment of the geographic scope of a concerted practice — Relevant evidence — Classification of a series of acts as a ‘single and continuous infringement’ — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 25 — Power of the Commission to impose a fine — Limitation)

cjeu_case ·