Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
13481

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-256/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
13482

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-256/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
13483

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#A. A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(d) and Article 40(2) and (3) – Subsequent application – Conditions for rejecting such an application as inadmissible – Concept of ‘new elements or findings’ – Judgment of the Court on a question of interpretation of EU law – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Jurisdiction of the national court or tribunal to rule on such an application on the merits in the event of illegality of the decision rejecting an application as inadmissible – Procedural safeguards – Article 14(2).#Case C-216/22.

cjeu_case ·
13484

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#A. A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(d) and Article 40(2) and (3) – Subsequent application – Conditions for rejecting such an application as inadmissible – Concept of ‘new elements or findings’ – Judgment of the Court on a question of interpretation of EU law – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Jurisdiction of the national court or tribunal to rule on such an application on the merits in the event of illegality of the decision rejecting an application as inadmissible – Procedural safeguards – Article 14(2).#Case C-216/22.

cjeu_case ·
13485

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 8 February 2024.#Real Madrid Club de Fútbol and AE v EE and Société Éditrice du Monde SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Articles 34 and 45 – Recognition and enforcement of judgments – Revocation of a declaration of enforceability of judgments – Grounds for refusal – Public policy in the State in which recognition is sought – Penalty imposed on a newspaper and one of its journalists for harm caused to the reputation of a sports club – Damages – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of the press.#Case C-633/22.

cjeu_case ·
13486

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 8 February 2024.#Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl v Comune di Rosignano Marittimo and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Concessions in respect of State-owned coastal land – Expiry and renewal – National rules providing that fixed structures built on State-owned land are to be transferred to the State for no consideration – Restriction – None.#Case C-598/22.

cjeu_case ·
13487

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 8 February 2024.#MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Mercedes-Benz Group AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the damage occurred – Cartel declared contrary to Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Subsidiaries established in different Member States – Direct damage exclusively suffered by subsidiaries – Action for damages from the parent company – Concept of ‘economic unit’.#Case C-425/22.

cjeu_case ·
13489

Case C-515/22 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024 – Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to a maritime transport undertaking – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive length of the procedure – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration)

cjeu_case ·
13490

Case C-514/22 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024 – Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission (Appeal– Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Six month time limit – Extension – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemptions – Advantage – Adverse effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive length of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Rights of the defence – General Court’s obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Unjust enrichment – Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Submission of an item of evidence out of time)

cjeu_case ·
13491

Case C-733/22,  Valentina Heights: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad – Bulgaria) –Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ – Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite v ‘Valentina Heights’ EOOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Annex III, point 12 – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Application of that rate only to accommodation facilities with a categorisation certificate – Principle of fiscal neutrality)

cjeu_case ·
13492

Case C-566/22,  Inkreal: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – Inkreal s.r.o. v Dúha reality s.r.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same Member State – Jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element)

cjeu_case ·
13493

Case C-256/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024 – Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB), European Commission, Pilatus Holding ltd. (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act)

cjeu_case ·
13494

Case C-216/22,  Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Admissibility of a subsequent application): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen – Germany) – A.A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(d) and Article 40(2) and (3) – Subsequent application – Conditions for rejecting such an application as inadmissible – Concept of ‘new elements or findings’ – Judgment of the Court on a question of interpretation of EU law – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Jurisdiction of the national court or tribunal to rule on such an application on the merits in the event of illegality of the decision rejecting an application as inadmissible – Procedural safeguards – Article 14(2))

cjeu_case ·
13496

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Tasks of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 6(5)(b) – Supervision of a credit institution directly by the ECB – Conditions – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-750/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
13497

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Tasks of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 6(5)(b) – Supervision of a credit institution directly by the ECB – Conditions – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-750/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
13498

Case C-750/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024 – Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB) (Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Tasks of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 6(5)(b) – Supervision of a credit institution directly by the ECB – Conditions – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act)

cjeu_case ·