13461Case T-62/24: Action brought on 08 February 2024 – Independent Farmers Organisation of Ireland v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13462Case C-111/24 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2024 by German Khan against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 29 November 2023 in Case T-333/22, Khan v Councilcjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13463Case C-109/24 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2024 by Viviane Van Oosterwijck against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2023 in Case T-622/22, Van Oosterwijck v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13464Case C-106/24, WEAREONE.WORLD BV: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium) lodged on 8 February 2024 – OV v WEAREONE.WORLD BVcjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13465Case C-105/24, Questore della Provincia di Ragusa and Ministero dell’Interno -II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 8 February 2024 – Questore della Provincia di Ragusa, Ministero dell’Interno v M.A.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13466Case C-104/24, Questore della Provincia di Ragusa and Ministero dell’Interno: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 8 February 2024 – Questore della Provincia di Ragusa, Ministero dell’Interno v D.A.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13467Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 February 2024.#Fly Persia IKE and Ali Barmodeh v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Intervention – Article 173(1) and Article 179 of the Rules of Procedure – Response lodged out of time – Articles 142 to 145 of the Rules of Procedure – Inapplicability – Rejection.#Case T-30/23.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13468Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 February 2024.#Fly Persia IKE and Ali Barmodeh v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Intervention – Article 173(1) and Article 179 of the Rules of Procedure – Response lodged out of time – Articles 142 to 145 of the Rules of Procedure – Inapplicability – Rejection.#Case T-30/23.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13469Case T-319/23: Order of the General Court of 8 February 2024 — Net Technologies Finland v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Enforceable decision — Withdrawal of the contested measure — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13470Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 February 2024.#HJ and Others v Twenty First Capital SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) – Operating conditions – Article 13 – AIFM remuneration policies and practices – Scope ratione temporis – Article 61 – Transitional provisions.#Case C-174/23.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13471Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 February 2024.#Père v Mère.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 10 and 11 – Jurisdiction in cases of the wrongful removal of a child – Child’s habitual residence in a Member State before the wrongful removal – Return procedure between a third country and a Member State – Concept of ‘request for return’ – The Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.#Case C-35/23.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13472Case T-778/22: Order of the General Court of 8 February 2024 — Desimo v EUIPO — Red Bull (EL TORO ROJO)cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13473Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to a maritime transport undertaking – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive length of the procedure – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case C-515/22 P.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13474Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Aid granted to a maritime transport undertaking – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Interest accrued – Limitation period – New aid – Incompatibility with the internal market – Effects of a cartel on the market – Excessive length of the procedure – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration.#Case C-515/22 P.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13475Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Six month time limit – Extension – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Adverse effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive length of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Rights of the defence – General Court’s obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Unjust enrichment – Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Submission of an item of evidence out of time.#Case C-514/22 P.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13476Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Tirrenia di navigazione SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – State aid – Maritime transport – Service of general economic interest – Decision declaring the aid unlawful – Decision declaring the aid compatible in part and incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering that it be recovered – Rescue aid – Compatibility with the internal market – Six month time limit – Extension – Obligation to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty – Tax exemption – Advantage – Adverse effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Excessive length of the procedure – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Rights of the defence – General Court’s obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Unjust enrichment – Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Submission of an item of evidence out of time.#Case C-514/22 P.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13477Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ – Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite v ‘Valentina Heights’ EOOD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Annex III, point 12 – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Application of that rate only to accommodation facilities with a categorisation certificate – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-733/22.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13478Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ – Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite v ‘Valentina Heights’ EOOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Annex III, point 12 – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Application of that rate only to accommodation facilities with a categorisation certificate – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-733/22.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13479Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Inkreal s.r.o. v Dúha reality s.r.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same Member State – Jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element.#Case C-566/22.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024
13480Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Inkreal s.r.o. v Dúha reality s.r.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same Member State – Jurisdiction of the courts of another Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element.#Case C-566/22.cjeu_case · 8 février 2024