Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
13381

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 February 2024.#Telefónica Gestión Integral de Edificios y Servicios, SL, formerly Taetel, SL and Banco Santander, SA, formerly Banco Popular Español, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities in favour of certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the acquisition of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its partial recovery – Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Joined Cases T-29/14 and T-31/14.

cjeu_case ·
13382

Joined Cases T-29/14 and T-31/14: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Telefónica Gestión Integral de Edificios y Servicios and Banco Santander v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by the Spanish authorities in favour of certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors — Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) — Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its partial recovery — Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute — No need to adjudicate in part — New aid — Recovery — Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market — Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities)

cjeu_case ·
13392

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 February 2024.#RF v Getin Noble Bank S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions – Power to restrict the enforcement of security interests – Provision for interpretation bearing no relation to the purpose of the main action – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-34/23.

cjeu_case ·
13393

Case C-34/23,  Getin Noble Bank: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Koszalinie – Poland) – RF v Getin Noble Bank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions – Power to restrict the enforcement of security interests – Provision for interpretation bearing no relation to the purpose of the main action – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
13394

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 February 2024.#K.L. v X sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Difference in treatment in the event of dismissal – Termination of a fixed-term employment contract – No obligation to state the reasons for termination – Judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-715/20.

cjeu_case ·
13395

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 February 2024.#K.L. v X sp. z o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Krakowa - Nowej Huty w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Difference in treatment in the event of dismissal – Termination of a fixed-term employment contract – No obligation to state the reasons for termination – Judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-715/20.

cjeu_case ·
13396

Case C-715/20,  (Lack of reasons for termination): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 February 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Krakowa – Nowej Huty w Krakowie – Poland) – K.L. v X sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Difference in treatment in the event of dismissal – Termination of a fixed-term employment contract – No obligation to state the reasons for termination – Judicial review – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·