Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
12661

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#T. S.A. v Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-22/22.

cjeu_case ·
12662

Case C-22/22, T. (Audiovisual programmes for children): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – T. S.A. / Przewodniczący Krajowej Rady Radiofonii i Telewizji (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
12663

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – National legislation providing for an extraordinary remedy allowing the reopening of civil proceedings closed by a final judgment – Grounds – Subsequent decision of a constitutional court declaring that a provision of national law on the basis of which that judgment was given is incompatible with the Constitution – Loss of the opportunity to take action on account of a breach of the law – Broad application of that remedy – Alleged infringement of EU law resulting from a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice ruling under Article 267 TFEU on the interpretation of EU law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Default judgment – Failure of the court hearing the case to ascertain of its own motion whether contractual terms are unfair.#Case C-582/21.

cjeu_case ·
12664

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy Warszawa-Praga w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – National legislation providing for an extraordinary remedy allowing the reopening of civil proceedings closed by a final judgment – Grounds – Subsequent decision of a constitutional court declaring that a provision of national law on the basis of which that judgment was given is incompatible with the Constitution – Loss of the opportunity to take action on account of a breach of the law – Broad application of that remedy – Alleged infringement of EU law resulting from a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice ruling under Article 267 TFEU on the interpretation of EU law – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Default judgment – Failure of the court hearing the case to ascertain of its own motion whether contractual terms are unfair.#Case C-582/21.

cjeu_case ·
12666

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2021/1117 – Implementing Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Community (2021-2026) – Signing on behalf of the European Union – Institution competent to designate the person empowered to sign – Article 13(2) TEU – Observance by each institution of the limits of the powers conferred on it – Mutual sincere cooperation between the EU institutions – Article 16(1) and (6) TEU – Power of the Council of the European Union to make policies and plan the EU’s external action – Article 17(1) TEU – Power of the European Commission to ensure the external representation of the European Union – Article 218 TFEU.#Case C-551/21.

cjeu_case ·
12667

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2021/1117 – Implementing Protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Gabonese Republic and the European Community (2021-2026) – Signing on behalf of the European Union – Institution competent to designate the person empowered to sign – Article 13(2) TEU – Observance by each institution of the limits of the powers conferred on it – Mutual sincere cooperation between the EU institutions – Article 16(1) and (6) TEU – Power of the Council of the European Union to make policies and plan the EU’s external action – Article 17(1) TEU – Power of the European Commission to ensure the external representation of the European Union – Article 218 TFEU.#Case C-551/21.

cjeu_case ·
12675

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 April 2024.#Sattvica SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-12/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
12676

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 8 avril 2024.#Sattvica SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-12/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
12677

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 April 2024.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-670/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
12678

Order of the Court of 8 April 2024.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik Anonim Sirketi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-670/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
12679

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against IC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Intellectual property – Act adversely affecting intellectual property rights – Criminal and administrative penalties – Principle of legality of criminal offences and penalties.#Case C-558/23.

cjeu_case ·
12680

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against IC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Intellectual property – Act adversely affecting intellectual property rights – Criminal and administrative penalties – Principle of legality of criminal offences and penalties.#Case C-558/23.

cjeu_case ·