12581Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 11 April 2024.#Anglo Austrian AAB AG v European Central Bank (ECB) and Belegging-Maatschappij 'Far-Est' BV.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Directive 2013/36/EU – Access to the activity of credit institutions – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Scope of the ECB’s powers – Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Division of powers between the ECB and the national authorities – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing – Findings of the General Court of the European Union with regard to national law – Examination of a potential distortion of national law.#Case C-579/22 P.cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12582Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 11 April 2024.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in favour of certain multinational groups – Taxation of the non-trading finance profits of controlled foreign companies (CFCs) – Exemptions – Significant people functions – Artificial diversion of profits – Erosion of the tax base – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid – Reference framework – Applicable national law – ‘Normal’ taxation.#Joined Cases C-555/22 P, C-556/22 P and C-564/22 P.cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12583Case C-770/22, OSTP Italy: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova – Italy) – OSTP Italy Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 1, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli, Ufficio delle Dogane di Genova 2, Agenzia delle Entrate – Riscossione – Genova (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Judgments at first instance annulling customs measures relating to traditional own resources of the European Union – Immediately implementable nature of those judgments – No suspension of implementation of judgments)cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12584Case C-723/22, Citadines: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München – Germany) – Citadines Betriebs GmbH v MPLC Deutschland GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Communication to the public – Meaning – Provision of television sets in a hotel – Transmission of a signal by means of a coaxial cable distributor – Directive 93/83/EEC – Cable retransmission – Cable operators – Meaning – Licensing agreement with collective management organisations for cable retransmission – Retransmission of that signal by means of that hotel’s own cable distribution network)cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12585Case C-687/22, Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (Exclusion of claims governed by public law from discharge of debt): Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Alicante - Spain) – Julieta, Rogelio v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Directive (EU) 2019/1023 – Procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt – Article 20 – Access to discharge – Article 20(1) – Full discharge of debt – Article 23 – Derogations – Article 23(4) – Exclusion of certain categories of debt from the discharge of debt – Exclusion of claims governed by public law – Justification under national law – Legal effects of directives – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12586Case C-654/22, Triferto Belgium: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, afdeling Gent – Belgium) – FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de voedselketen & Leefmilieu v Triferto Belgium NVcjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12587Case C-316/22, Gabel Industria Tessile and Canavesi: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Como - Italy) - Gabel Industria Tessile SpA, Canavesi SpA v A2A Energia SpA, Energit SpA, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 1(2) – Excise duties – Electricity – National legislation creating an additional tax on electricity excise duties – Lack of specific purposes – Additional tax deemed contrary to Directive 2008/118/EC by the national courts – Recovery by the final consumer of the tax unduly paid from the supplier alone – Article 288 TFEU – Direct effect – Principle of effectiveness)cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12588Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#GP v juris GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82 – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing that infringes that regulation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Impact of the seriousness of the damage suffered – Liability of the controller – Possible exemption in the event of default of a person acting under his or her authority within the meaning of Article 29 – Assessment of the amount of compensation – Inapplicability of the criteria laid down for administrative fines in Article 83 – Assessment in the event of multiple infringements of that regulation.#Case C-741/21.cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12589Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 11 April 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21.cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12590Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 11 April 2024.#D. K. and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence – Resolution of the college of a court withdrawing all cases from a judge – Lack of objective criteria for taking a withdrawal decision – Lack of obligation to state reasons for such a decision – Primacy of EU law – Obligation to disapply such a decision to withdraw cases.#Joined Cases C-647/21 and C-648/21.cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12591Case C-741/21, juris: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken - Germany) - GP v juris GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82 – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing that infringes that regulation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Impact of the seriousness of the damage suffered – Liability of the controller – Possible exemption in the event of default of a person acting under his or her authority within the meaning of Article 29 – Assessment of the amount of compensation – Inapplicability of the criteria laid down for administrative fines in Article 83 – Assessment in the event of multiple infringements of that regulation)cjeu_case · 11 avril 2024
12592Case C-250/24: Action brought on 10 April 2024 – European Commission v Kingdom of Spaincjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12593Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mushie & Co, LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Mushie – Earlier EU word mark KUSHIES – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Professional representation – Article 120(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-262/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12594Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Mushie & Co, LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Mushie – Earlier EU word mark KUSHIES – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Professional representation – Article 120(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-262/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12595Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-161/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12596Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Rebell – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-161/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12597Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-63/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12598Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-63/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12599Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-62/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024
12600Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2024.#Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing part of solar panels – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – No different overall impression – Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-62/23.cjeu_case · 10 avril 2024