12481Case T-209/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Yadex International v EUIPO – Armada Gida (doyum)cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12482Case T-119/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Insider v EUIPO – Alaj (in Insajderi)cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12483Case T-76/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US 8 v EUIPO – Taniobis (AMBERTEC)cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12484Case T-2/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – Romagnoli Fratelli v CPVO (Melrose)cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12485Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Cogebi and Cogebi, a.s. v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on purchasing, importing or transferring, directly or indirectly, in the European Union, goods which generate significant revenues for Russia as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Mica products – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures which directly affects the legal situation of importers – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right of access to the file – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-782/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12486Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Cogebi and Cogebi, a.s. v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on purchasing, importing or transferring, directly or indirectly, in the European Union, goods which generate significant revenues for Russia as listed in Annex XXI to Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Mica products – Action for annulment – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures which directly affects the legal situation of importers – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Right of access to the file – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-782/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12487Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Föreningen Svenskt Landskapsskydd v European Commission.#Environment – Swedish Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-346/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12488Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Föreningen Svenskt Landskapsskydd v European Commission.#Environment – Swedish Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-346/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12489Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Stöttingfjällets Miljöskyddsförening v European Commission.#Environment – Swedish Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-345/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12490Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Stöttingfjällets Miljöskyddsförening v European Commission.#Environment – Swedish Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-345/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12491Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Stichting Nationaal Kritisch Platform Windenergie v European Commission.#Environment – Netherlands Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-344/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12492Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Stichting Nationaal Kritisch Platform Windenergie v European Commission.#Environment – Netherlands Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-344/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12493Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Nederlandse Vereniging Omwonenden Windturbines (NLVOW) v European Commission.#Environment – Netherlands Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-331/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12494Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Nederlandse Vereniging Omwonenden Windturbines (NLVOW) v European Commission.#Environment – Netherlands Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan 2021-2030 – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Rejection of the request – Application for annulment – Error of assessment – Action for failure to act – No invitation to act – Inadmissibility.#Case T-331/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12495Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark coinbase – International registration of the earlier word mark COINBASE – International registration of the earlier figurative mark coinbase exchange – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12496Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark coinbase – International registration of the earlier word mark COINBASE – International registration of the earlier figurative mark coinbase exchange – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-126/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12497Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 April 2024.#Ideella föreningen Svenska Bankföreningen med firma Svenska Bankföreningen, Näringsverksamhet and Länsförsäkringar Bank AB v European Commission.#State aid – Swedish tax law – Tax on the systemic risk of credit institutions – Decision not to raise any objections – Selective nature – Objective of the measure – Derogation from the reference system.#Case T-112/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12498Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 April 2024.#Ideella föreningen Svenska Bankföreningen med firma Svenska Bankföreningen, Näringsverksamhet and Länsförsäkringar Bank AB v European Commission.#State aid – Swedish tax law – Tax on the systemic risk of credit institutions – Decision not to raise any objections – Selective nature – Objective of the measure – Derogation from the reference system.#Case T-112/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12499Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Romania – Deficiencies in administrative checks – Overlap between two investigations – Article 34(6) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 – Fallow land and temporary grassland – Article 44 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Error of assessment.#Case T-49/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024
12500Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 April 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Romania – Deficiencies in administrative checks – Overlap between two investigations – Article 34(6) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 – Fallow land and temporary grassland – Article 44 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Error of assessment.#Case T-49/22.cjeu_case · 17 avril 2024