11962Case T-264/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – Laboratorios Salvat v EUIPO – Acta Farma (Omycol)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11963Case T-263/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – Noster Finance v EUIPO – Wewi Mobile (finect)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11965Case T-261/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – Birių Krovinių Terminalas v Council and Commissioncjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11966Case C-364/24, Dalfardo: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 17 May 2024 – PH, on his own account and as owner of the agricultural holding In Trois v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Forestecjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11967Case C-363/24, Finansinspektionen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 17 May 2024 – Finansinspektionen v Carnegie Investment Bank ABcjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11968Case C-361/24, Grecniaka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 17 May 2024 – RX v FZ and VTcjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11969Case C-359/24: Action brought on 17 May 2024 – European Commission v Hellenic Republiccjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11970C-88/24, Bankinter Consumer Finance: Order of the President of the Court of 17 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 1 de Fuenlabrada – Spain) – A.B.D. v Bankinter Consumer Finance, E.F.C., S.A.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11971Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against VGG AG and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Absence of sufficient information – Article 56 TFEU – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Scope – Prohibition of restrictions on the cross-frontier provision of services not exceeding 90 days per calendar year – Provision of services in France for a period exceeding 90 days – Manifest inadmissibility – No situation of implementation of EU law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-190/23.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11972Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against VGG AG and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the investigating judge at the tribunal judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Absence of sufficient information – Article 56 TFEU – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Scope – Prohibition of restrictions on the cross-frontier provision of services not exceeding 90 days per calendar year – Provision of services in France for a period exceeding 90 days – Manifest inadmissibility – No situation of implementation of EU law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-190/23.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11973Case C-190/23, VGG: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the investigating judge at the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris – France) – criminal proceedings against VGG AG, VGG Entertainment Inc., Dan A., M. Trade SAS, D. SASU, T. Logistique SAS, Arthur C., S. SAS, Grégory B., David C., David M., IE, CID (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Absence of sufficient information – Article 56 TFEU – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Scope – Prohibition of restrictions on the cross-frontier provision of services not exceeding 90 days per calendar year – Provision of services in France for a period exceeding 90 days – Manifest inadmissibility – No situation of implementation of EU law – Manifest lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11974Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v Mytilinaios AE – Omilos Epicheiriseon.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-332/18 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11975Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 May 2024.#Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v Mytilinaios AE – Omilos Epicheiriseon.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-332/18 P-DEP.cjeu_case · 17 mai 2024
11976Case T-260/24: Action brought on 16 May 2024 – Apple and Apple Distribution International v Commissioncjeu_case · 16 mai 2024
11977Case T-259/24: Action brought on 16 May 2024 – Kudsi Alattar v EUIPO – Medelhavet Gross (Chamain)cjeu_case · 16 mai 2024
11978Case T-111/24: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2024 – Whitehorse Liquidity Partners v EUIPO – HIG Whitehorse Management (H.I.G. WHITEHORSE)cjeu_case · 16 mai 2024
11979Case C-362/24 P: Appeal brought on 16 May 2024 by MHCS against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 6 March 2024 in Case T-652/22, Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO – MHCS (Shade of the Colour Orange)cjeu_case · 16 mai 2024
11980Case C-358/24, Varo Energy Belgium and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 16 May 2024 – Varo Energy Belgium NV, EG Retail (Belgium) BV, Gilops Group NV, Van Raak Trading NV, Kuwait Petroleum (Belgium) NV v Ministerraad (Eerste Minister)cjeu_case · 16 mai 2024