11561Case T-199/23: Order of the General Court of 13 June 2024 – Hansol Paper v Commission (Dumping – Imports of certain lightweight thermal paper originating in South Korea – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Calculation of the dumping margin – Weighting of sales affecting the dumping calculation – Calculation of the normal value – Hierarchy between the calculation methods – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11562Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#D. SA v P. SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Reasonable preventive measures – Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect – Design defect affecting an aircraft engine – Obligation of the air carrier to have back-up aircraft.#Case C-411/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11563Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#D. SA v P. SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Reasonable preventive measures – Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect – Design defect affecting an aircraft engine – Obligation of the air carrier to have back-up aircraft.#Case C-411/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11564Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Matkustaja A v Finnair Oyj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect revealed by the manufacturer after cancellation of the flight – System for measuring the quantity of fuel in the aircraft.#Case C-385/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11565Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Matkustaja A v Finnair Oyj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect revealed by the manufacturer after cancellation of the flight – System for measuring the quantity of fuel in the aircraft.#Case C-385/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11566Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#UN v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19 TEU – Article 45 TFEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Income tax – Convention for the avoidance of double taxation – Mutual agreement procedure provided for under such a convention – Member State, at the end of that procedure, making the right to restitution of tax already paid in another Member State conditional upon the withdrawal by the taxpayer of his or her actions brought before the courts of that first Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-380/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11567Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#UN v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance du Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19 TEU – Article 45 TFEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Income tax – Convention for the avoidance of double taxation – Mutual agreement procedure provided for under such a convention – Member State, at the end of that procedure, making the right to restitution of tax already paid in another Member State conditional upon the withdrawal by the taxpayer of his or her actions brought before the courts of that first Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-380/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11568Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#A. S.A. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/96/EC – Article 2(4)(b), third indent – Article 17(1)(a) – Excise duty – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Electricity used in electrolysis – Tax reductions on the consumption of energy products and electricity for energy-intensive businesses – Purchase of energy products and electricity – Actual cost of energy purchased – Distribution tariffs – Criteria for exemption – Principle of equality and non-discrimination.#Case C-266/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11569Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#A. S.A. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/96/EC – Article 2(4)(b), third indent – Article 17(1)(a) – Excise duty – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Electricity used in electrolysis – Tax reductions on the consumption of energy products and electricity for energy-intensive businesses – Purchase of energy products and electricity – Actual cost of energy purchased – Distribution tariffs – Criteria for exemption – Principle of equality and non-discrimination.#Case C-266/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11570Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising listening, tapping and storage in respect of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – National legislation requiring that that decision must itself contain an express statement of reasons in writing, irrespective of the existence of a reasoned application made by the criminal authorities – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-229/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11571Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising listening, tapping and storage in respect of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – National legislation requiring that that decision must itself contain an express statement of reasons in writing, irrespective of the existence of a reasoned application made by the criminal authorities – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-229/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11572Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#A GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff heading 9406 00 – Prefabricated buildings – Scope of the concept of ‘building’ – Calf hutches – Request for classification under subheading 9406 00 80 – Classified under subheading 3926 90 97.#Case C-104/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11573Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#A GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff heading 9406 00 – Prefabricated buildings – Scope of the concept of ‘building’ – Calf hutches – Request for classification under subheading 9406 00 80 – Classified under subheading 3926 90 97.#Case C-104/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11574Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Pedro Francisco v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 27 – Restrictions on the right of entry and the right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health – Conduct representing a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society – Refusal to issue a temporary residence card of a family member of a Union citizen due to a police record – Unfavourable police report due to arrest.#Case C-62/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11575Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Pedro Francisco v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo n° 5 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 27 – Restrictions on the right of entry and the right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health – Conduct representing a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society – Refusal to issue a temporary residence card of a family member of a Union citizen due to a police record – Unfavourable police report due to arrest.#Case C-62/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11576Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Appeal – State aid – Law prohibiting the use of coal for the production of electricity – Early closure of a coal-powered power plant – Award of compensation – Decision declaring the measure compatible with the internal market without stating whether State aid exists – Exercise of the European Commission’s powers.#Case C-40/23 P.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11577Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands.#Appeal – State aid – Law prohibiting the use of coal for the production of electricity – Early closure of a coal-powered power plant – Award of compensation – Decision declaring the measure compatible with the internal market without stating whether State aid exists – Exercise of the European Commission’s powers.#Case C-40/23 P.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11578Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 13 June 2024.#Guldbrev AB v Konsumentombudsmannen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair commercial practices – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 2(c), (d) and (i) – Article 3(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘product’ – Combined offer consisting of the valuation and purchase of a good.#Case C-379/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11579Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 13 June 2024.#Haut Conseil du commissariat aux comptes v MO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the formation restreinte du Haut Conseil du commissariat aux comptes.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Public authority not subject to regulation and/or oversight of statutory auditors – Internal organisational arrangements – Power to initiate infringement proceedings – Power to impose penalties – Decision against which an action for annulment may be brought – No status as ‘third party’ in relation to the authority having adopted the decision under judicial review – Inadmissibility.#Case C-368/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024
11580Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 13 June 2024.#Tecno*37 v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Bologna.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 25(1) – Restrictions on multidisciplinary activities – Regulated profession – National legislation providing for, as a general rule, the incompatibility of the joint exercise of the activity of property brokerage and that of property manager – Requirements of independence and impartiality – Proportionality of the restriction – Consequences of the closure of an infringement procedure brought by the European Commission against a Member State.#Case C-242/23.cjeu_case · 13 juin 2024