Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
11501

Case T-738/22: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – Rotenberg v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Definition of benefitting from Russian decision-makers – Definition of benefitting from the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(d) and (f) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business)

cjeu_case ·
11502

Case T-671/22: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – Vima World v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Set-off of taxes paid in another Member State with a view to preventing double taxation – Fiscal autonomy of the Member States – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
11506

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2024.#PV v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-89/20.

cjeu_case ·
11507

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2024.#PV v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-89/20.

cjeu_case ·
11508

Case T-89/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2024 – PV v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary sanction – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal from post – New disciplinary procedure – New removal from post – Unjustified absences – Conflict of interests – Impartiality – Material and non-material damage)

cjeu_case ·
11517

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 18 June 2024.#Herbaria Kräuterparadies GmbH v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic products – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Organic production rules – Article 16 – Labelling – Article 30 – Terms referring to organic production – Article 33 – Organic production logo of the European Union – Conditions of use – Compliance of the product with Regulation 2018/848 – Articles 45 and 48 – Import of products from a third country for the purpose of placing them on the market within the European Union as organic products – Equivalence of the production rules of that third country with the rules of Regulation 2018/848 – Use of the third country’s organic production logo.#Case C-240/23.

cjeu_case ·
11518

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 18 June 2024.#KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or its development – Obligation for the national supreme court to consider, in proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law, whether a reference for a preliminary ruling should be made – Statement of reasons for the decision refusing leave to appeal on a point of law.#Case C-144/23.

cjeu_case ·
11519

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination.#Case C-753/22.

cjeu_case ·
11520

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination.#Case C-753/22.

cjeu_case ·