Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
11401

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 June 2024.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-737/22.

cjeu_case ·
11402

Case T-789/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2024 – PB v SRB (Civil service – Temporary agents – Psychological harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Absence of prima facie evidence – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Principle of sound administration – Duty of care – Responsibility)

cjeu_case ·
11403

Case T-740/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2024 – Pumpyanskiy v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of leading businessperson – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
11404

Case T-737/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2024 – Pumpyanskaya v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of association – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
11405

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 June 2024.#Georgios Paraskevaidis v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Refusal to grant – Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Vocational training – Higher education – Delegation of powers – Recall of the delegated powers – Competent appointing authority.#Case T-698/21.

cjeu_case ·
11406

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 June 2024.#Georgios Paraskevaidis v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Refusal to grant – Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Vocational training – Higher education – Delegation of powers – Recall of the delegated powers – Competent appointing authority.#Case T-698/21.

cjeu_case ·
11408

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 June 2024.#Aluminios Cortizo, SAU and Cortizo Cartera, SL v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish Tax Lease System) – Decision declaring the aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual terms protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-1/14.

cjeu_case ·
11409

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 June 2024.#Aluminios Cortizo, SAU and Cortizo Cartera, SL v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish Tax Lease System) – Decision declaring the aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual terms protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-1/14.

cjeu_case ·
11410

Case T-1/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2024 – Aluminios Cortizo and Cortizo Cartera v Commission (State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Partial disappearance of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities)

cjeu_case ·
11416

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi - Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău - Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 308 – Special scheme for travel agents – Scope – Transactions carried out by travel agents consisting of the resale, at a price including a mark-up, of airline tickets purchased from taxable third parties – Absence of additional service.#Case C-763/23.

cjeu_case ·
11417

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi - Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău - Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 308 – Special scheme for travel agents – Scope – Transactions carried out by travel agents consisting of the resale, at a price including a mark-up, of airline tickets purchased from taxable third parties – Absence of additional service.#Case C-763/23.

cjeu_case ·
11418

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E... D...#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-401/23.

cjeu_case ·
11419

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2024.#Caisse autonome de retraite des chirurgiens dentistes et des sages-femmes (CARCDSF) v E... D...#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Metz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Obligation of affiliation and to pay contributions to a pension scheme – Purely internal situation – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court – Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-401/23.

cjeu_case ·
11420

Case C-763/23, Dragoram Tour: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 June 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău – Romania) – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bacău – Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v S.C. Dragoram Tour S.R.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 308 – Special scheme for travel agents – Scope – Transactions carried out by travel agents consisting of the resale, at a price including a mark-up, of airline tickets purchased from taxable third parties – Absence of additional service)

cjeu_case ·