Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
11203

Case C-288/24, Stegmon: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin – Germany) – Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v M.R. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Criminal proceedings – Pre-trial detention of the accused person – Consequence of a reference for a preliminary ruling on the main proceedings – Refusal by the referring court to continue the proceedings on the substance of the case until the response of the Court of Justice has been received – Principle of proceeding expeditiously in criminal proceedings particularly in cases involving detention – Recusal of the Chair of the panel hearing the application for legitimate suspicion of conflict of interests)

cjeu_case ·
11204

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Required unanimity not achieved – Manifest inadmissibility in part of the action at first instance – Request for a time limit capable of allowing the appeal to be ‘resumed’ – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part of the General Court of the European Union – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-787/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
11205

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Required unanimity not achieved – Manifest inadmissibility in part of the action at first instance – Request for a time limit capable of allowing the appeal to be ‘resumed’ – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part of the General Court of the European Union – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-787/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
11206

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Obligation to adopt a decision pursuant to the Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-786/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
11207

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Obligation to adopt a decision pursuant to the Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-786/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
11212

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against Procureur du Roi près du Tribunal de Première Instance d’Eupen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of laws – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2014/31/EU – Scope – Non-automatic weighing instruments for the purpose of determining the mass of vehicles – Use of weighing instruments for the purposes of applying national criminal legislation.#Case C-283/23.

cjeu_case ·
11213

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against FB and JL Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of laws – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2014/31/EU – Scope – Non-automatic weighing instruments for the purpose of determining the mass of vehicles – Use of weighing instruments for the purposes of applying national criminal legislation.#Case C-283/23.

cjeu_case ·
11214

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Guvernul României and Ministerul Finanțelor.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Supply of services effected for consideration – Management fees collected by a collective management organisation for copyright and related rights for the collection, distribution and payment of remuneration due to rightholders – Remuneration not forming part of a taxable transaction.#Case C-179/23.

cjeu_case ·
11215

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Guvernul României and Ministerul Finanțelor.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Supply of services for consideration – Management fees collected by a collective management organisation for copyright and related rights for the collection, distribution and payment of remuneration due to rightholders – Remuneration not forming part of a taxable transaction.#Case C-179/23.

cjeu_case ·
11216

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Biedrība 'Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supply of services for consideration – Article 9(1) – Concepts of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ – Non-profit association carrying out projects financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Supply of training services through subcontractors – Inclusion of the amount of the subsidy in the taxable amount – Article 73.#Case C-87/23.

cjeu_case ·
11217

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Biedrība 'Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supply of services for consideration – Article 9(1) – Concepts of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ – Non-profit association carrying out projects financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Supply of training services through subcontractors – Inclusion of the amount of the subsidy in the taxable amount – Article 73.#Case C-87/23.

cjeu_case ·
11218

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine – Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-70/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
11219

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine – Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-70/23 P.

cjeu_case ·