Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
11184

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2024.#Rǎzvan-Eugen Nicolescu and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Absence of the required unanimity – Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-732/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
11185

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2024.#Rǎzvan-Eugen Nicolescu and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 263 TFEU – Action for annulment – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Absence of a challengeable act – Absence of the required unanimity – Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-732/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
11193

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2024.#SIA „EUROCASH1” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and VSIA „Paula Stradiņa klīniskā universitātes slimnīca”.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 4(d) – Threshold amounts for public contracts – Threshold not reached – Article 69 – Abnormally low tenders – No evidence demonstrating a direct and unconditional reference to the provisions of that directive – No certain cross border interest – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-788/23.

cjeu_case ·
11194

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2024.#'EUROCASH1' SIA v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and 'Paula Stradiņa klīniskā universitātes slimnīca' VSIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 4(d) – Threshold amounts for public contracts – Threshold not reached – Article 69 – Abnormally low tenders – No evidence demonstrating a direct and unconditional reference to the provisions of that directive – No certain cross border interest – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-788/23.

cjeu_case ·
11195

Case C-788/23, EUROCASH1: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) – Latvia) – EUROCASH1 SIA v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs, Paula Stradiņa klīniskā universitātes slimnīca VSIA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 4(d) – Threshold amounts for public contracts – Threshold not reached – Article 69 – Abnormally low tenders – No evidence demonstrating a direct and unconditional reference to the provisions of that directive – No certain cross border interest – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
11197

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 4 July 2024.#Thomas Henry GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-295/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
11199

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against M.R.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Criminal proceedings – Accused person remanded in custody – Consequence of a reference for a preliminary ruling on the main proceedings – Refusal by the referring court to continue the proceedings on the substance of the case until the response of the Court of Justice has been received – Duty to proceed expeditiously in criminal proceedings particularly in cases involving detention – Request for the recusal of a judge hearing the application for legitimate suspicion of conflict of interests.#Case C-288/24.

cjeu_case ·
11200

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against M.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Criminal proceedings – Accused person remanded in custody – Consequence of a reference for a preliminary ruling on the main proceedings – Refusal by the referring court to continue the proceedings on the substance of the case until the response of the Court of Justice has been received – Duty to proceed expeditiously in criminal proceedings particularly in cases involving detention – Request for the recusal of a judge hearing the application for legitimate suspicion of conflict of interests.#Case C-288/24.

cjeu_case ·