11061Removal from the Court register: Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – JD, HE v Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Case C-395/24, Condor Flugdienst)cjeu_case · 12 juillet 2024
11062Case C-617/23: Order of the President of the Court of 12 July 2024 – European Commission v Republic of Cypruscjeu_case · 12 juillet 2024
11063Case T-357/24: Action brought on 11 July 2024 – Opera Norway v Commissioncjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11064Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 July 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-248/24 P.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11065Order of the Court of 11 July 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-248/24 P.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11066Case C-489/24, Safita: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 July 2024 – Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, Xcjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11067Case C-488/24, Kigas: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 11 July 2024 – D.V. v Kigas MBcjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11068Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 11 July 2024.#P.P.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Braşov.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Surrender of requested persons to issuing judicial authorities – Respect for fundamental rights – Systemic or generalised deficiencies concerning the independence of the judiciary of the issuing Member State – Deficiencies concerning the absence of proof of the taking of an oath by judges – Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment – Detention conditions in the issuing Member State – Assessment undertaken by the executing judicial authority – Refusal by the executing judicial authority to execute the European arrest warrant – Effects of that refusal for the executing judicial authority of another Member State.#Case C-318/24 PPU.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11069Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Communauté d’Agglomération du Boulonnais v European Commission.#Case T-582/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11070Case T-582/23: Order of the General Court of 11 July 2024 – Communauté d’Agglomération du Boulonnais v Commission (Action for annulment – State aid – Tax exemptions for operators of French ports – Complaint – Act not open to challenge – Purely confirmatory act – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11071Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB).#Appeal – Civil service – Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Remuneration – Update of the basic salaries scale – Taking into account of the rate of inflation at the place of employment – Staff Regulations – Article 20 – Annex I – Statement of reasons – Distortion of evidence.#Case C-561/23 P.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11072Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Vincent Thunus and Others v European Investment Bank (EIB).#Appeal – Civil service – Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Remuneration – Update of the basic salaries scale – Taking into account of the rate of inflation at the place of employment – Staff Regulations – Article 20 – Annex I – Statement of reasons – Distortion of evidence.#Case C-561/23 P.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11073Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combatting late payment in commercial transactions – Article 4 – Commercial transactions between undertakings and public authorities – Obligation of Member States to ensure that public authorities comply with the periods of payment laid down in that article.#Case C-487/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11074Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combatting late payment in commercial transactions – Article 4 – Commercial transactions between undertakings and public authorities – Obligation of Member States to ensure that public authorities comply with the periods of payment laid down in that article.#Case C-487/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11075Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Skarb Państwa - Dyrektor Okręgowego Urzędu Miar w K. v Z. sp.j.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Article 6(1) – Fixed minimum sum by way of compensation for recovery costs – Provision of national law permitting the rejection of claims for payment of that fixed sum in cases where the delay is not significant or the claim is small – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-279/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11076Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Skarb Państwa - Dyrektor Okręgowego Urzędu Miar w K. v Z. sp.j.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Katowice - Zachód w Katowicach.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Article 6(1) – Fixed minimum sum by way of compensation for recovery costs – Provision of national law permitting the rejection of claims for payment of that fixed sum in cases where the delay is not significant or the claim is small – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-279/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11077Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against DM and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against organised crime – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Excessive length of the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Infringements of procedural rules affecting the indictment which are substantive but which are capable of being remedied – Right of the accused person to bring to an end the criminal proceedings initiated against him or her.#Case C-265/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11078Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Criminal proceedings against DM and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad - Sliven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against organised crime – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Excessive length of the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Substantive infringements of procedural rules, but which are capable of being remedied, affecting the indictment – Right of the accused person to have the criminal proceedings against him or her brought to an end.#Case C-265/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11079Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#CL and Others v DB, héritière universelle de FC and Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1)(a) and Article 2 – Obligation to inform and consult workers’ representatives – Scope – Termination of employment contracts on the ground of the employer’s retirement – Articles 27 and 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-196/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024
11080Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#CL and Others v DB and Fondo de Garantía Salarial (FOGASA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1)(a) and Article 2 – Obligation to inform and consult workers’ representatives – Scope – Termination of employment contracts on the ground of the employer’s retirement – Articles 27 and 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-196/23.cjeu_case · 11 juillet 2024