10301Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#TU v European Parliament.#Civil service – Accredited parliamentary assistants – Termination of service – Fixed-term contract – Non-renewal – Status of informant – Articles 22a to 22c of the Staff Regulations – Protective measures – Confidentiality – Non-material damage.#Case T-793/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10302Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Definition of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Definition of ‘benefiting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-744/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10303Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Definition of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Definition of ‘benefiting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Error of assessment – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-744/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10304Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘person benefiting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-741/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10305Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1) in fine of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘person benefiting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-741/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10306Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Misuse of powers – Power of the Council – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-644/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10307Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Misuse of powers – Power of the Council – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-644/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10308Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Mikhail Fridman and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Power of the Council – Proportionality.#Case T-635/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10309Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Mikhail Fridman and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Power of the Council – Proportionality.#Case T-635/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10310Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV v European Commission.#EU fertilising products – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in fertilising products – Precautionary principle – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-560/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10311Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV v European Commission.#EU fertilising products – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in fertilising products – Precautionary principle – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-560/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10312Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Marina Alexandrova Mordashova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Applicant’s name included and maintained on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit obtained from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-497/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10313Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Marina Alexandrova Mordashova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Applicant’s name included and maintained on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit obtained from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Legal certainty – Principle of non-discrimination – Right to be heard.#Case T-497/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10314Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Definition of ‘supporting, materially or financially, the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-494/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10315Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 September 2024.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Definition of ‘supporting, materially or financially, the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Proportionality.#Case T-494/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10316Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Musa Yusopovich Bazhaev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to private life – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-362/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10317Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Musa Yusopovich Bazhaev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons’ – Article 2(1)(d) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to private life – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-362/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10318Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Compliance check of registrations – Substance 1,3-dioxo-2-benzofuran-5-carboxylic acid with nonan-1-ol – Failure to respond to the compliance check decision – Article 50 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Proportionality.#Case T-192/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10319Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Compliance check of registrations – Substance 1,3-dioxo-2-benzofuran-5-carboxylic acid with nonan-1-ol – Failure to respond to the compliance check decision – Article 50 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Proportionality.#Case T-192/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024
10320Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#Vyatsky Plywood Mill OOO v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of birch plywood originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1930 – Objective examination – Post-investigation period – Market segmentation – Other injury factors – Article 3(2), (6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Equal treatment – Union interest – Article 21 of Regulation 2016/1036 – Rights of the defence.#Case T-32/22.cjeu_case · 11 septembre 2024