10061Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#TransnetBW GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-476/21.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10062Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#TransnetBW GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-476/21.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10063Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#RTE Réseau de transport d'électricité v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-472/21.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10064Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#RTE Réseau de transport d'électricité v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-472/21.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10065Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Commission de régulation de l’énergie (CRE) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-446/21.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10066Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Commission de régulation de l’énergie (CRE) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943.#Case T-446/21.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10067Case T-485/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – BNetzA v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10068Case T-484/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10069Case T-483/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – Polskie sieci elektroenergetyczne v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Common methodology for regional coordination of operational security – Rejection of the proposal of the system operators – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Compatibility with Regulation (EU) 2019/942, Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Regulation (EU) 2017/1485)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10070Case T-482/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – TenneT TSO and TenneT TSO v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Obligation to state reasons – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10071Case T-476/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – TransnetBW v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10072Case T-472/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – RTE v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10073Case T-446/21: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – CRE v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Capacity calculation region – Core region – Adoption by ACER of the methodology for cost sharing of redispatching and countertrading – Determination of the threshold for legitimate loop flows – Article 16(13) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10074Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Internal market – Representation before EUIPO – Entry on the list of professional representatives – Refusal of the request – Requester who is not a national of a Member State of the EEA – Exemption from the nationality requirement – Article 120(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Concept of highly qualified professional – Principle of legal certainty – Right to be heard – Alteration – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case T-727/20 RENV.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10075Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 September 2024.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Internal market – Representation before EUIPO – Entry on the list of professional representatives – Refusal of the request – Requester who is not a national of a Member State of the EEA – Exemption from the nationality requirement – Article 120(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Concept of highly qualified professional – Principle of legal certainty – Right to be heard – Alteration – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case T-727/20 RENV.cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10076Case T-727/20 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2024 – Kirimova v EUIPO (Internal market – Representation before EUIPO – Entry on the list of professional representatives – Refusal of the request – Requester who is not a national of a Member State of the EEA – Exemption from the nationality requirement – Article 120(4)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Concept of highly qualified professional – Principle of legal certainty – Right to be heard – Alteration – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court)cjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10077Case T-495/24: Action brought on 24 September 2024 – FG v Commissioncjeu_case · 24 septembre 2024
10078Order of the Court of 24 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-355/24 P.cjeu_case · 24 septembre 2024
10079Order of the Court of 24 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-355/24 P.cjeu_case · 24 septembre 2024
10080Case C-626/24, PRAGON: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 24 September 2024 – PRAGON s.r.o. v Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce, Inspektorát v Prazecjeu_case · 24 septembre 2024