10021Case C-255/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2024 – Orlen S.A., formerly Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen S.A., formerly Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission (Appeal – Competition – Gas markets of Central and Eastern Europe – Article 102 TFEU – Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Abuse of dominant position – Upstream gas supplies in Central and Eastern Europe – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 9(1) – Decision of the European Commission to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Action for annulment – Adequacy of those commitments in the light of the competition concerns identified in the statement of objections – Nature of the EU Courts’ power of review – Commission decision not to require commitments in relation to some of the initial concerns – Principle of good administration – Principle of proportionality – Obligation to state reasons – Energy policy objectives of the European Union – Article 194 TFEU – Principle of energy solidarity)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10022Joined Cases C-160/22 P and C-161/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024 – European Commission v HB (Appeal – Public supply contracts – Irregularities in the procedure for the award of a public contract – European Commission recovery decision adopted after the signature of the contract – Legal nature – Decision not having effects exclusively in the context of that contract – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Administrative measures – Exercise of powers as a public authority – Action for annulment – Article 263 TFEU – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10023Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#WEPA Hygieneprodukte GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-795/21 P and C-796/21 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10024Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Federal Republic of Germany and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-794/21 P and C-800/21 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10025Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Federal Republic of Germany and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-794/21 P and C-800/21 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10026Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#AZ and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-792/21 P and C-793/21 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10027Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#AZ and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-792/21 P and C-793/21 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10028Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Covestro Deutschland AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-790/21 P and C-791/21 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10029Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Covestro Deutschland AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State aid’ – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges.#Joined Cases C-790/21 P and C-791/21 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10030Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10031Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#TR v Land Hessen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits.#Case C-768/21.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10032Joined Cases C-795/21 P and C-796/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024 – WEPA Hygieneprodukte GmbH, WEPA Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, formerly Wepa Leuna and Wepa Papierfabrik Sachsen, Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of State aid – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10033Joined Cases C-794/21 P and C-800/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024 – Federal Republic of Germany, Infineon Technologies Dresden GmbH & Co. KG, Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of State aid – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10034Joined Cases C-792/21 P and C-793/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024 – AZ, Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of State aid – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10035Joined Cases C-790/21 P and C-791/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024 – Covestro Deutschland AG, Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of large electricity consumers – Exemption from network charges in 2012 and 2013 – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of State aid – State resources – Parafiscal charge or other compulsory surcharges)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10036Case C-768/21, Land Hessen (Obligation to act by the data protection authority): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wiesbaden – Germany) – TR v Land Hessen (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(a) and (f) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Article 58(2) – Corrective powers – Administrative fine – Discretion of the supervisory authority – Limits)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10037Case T-499/24: Action brought on 25 September 2024 – Zdravniška Zbornica Slovenije v Commissioncjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10038Case C-629/24, Costa Crociere and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 25 September 2024 – MH, Costa Crociere SpA v Costa Crociere SpA, Axyme Selàrl, Generali IARD SA, Hiscox Insurance Company Ltd, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie (CPAM) de Paris, DI, DM, WT, Croisière Club SAS, Hiscox SA, Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie (CPAM) du Puy-De-Dômecjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10039Case C-625/24, ClaimCompass: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 25 September 2024 – ClaimCompass EOODcjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024
10040Case C-624/24, Kohlgartner: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 September 2024 – SK v V AGcjeu_case · 25 septembre 2024