9981Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#F SCS and Ordre des avocats du Barreau de Luxembourg v Administration des contributions directes.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Directive 2011/16/EU – Exchange of information on request – Decision ordering a lawyer to communicate information – Legal professional privilege – Article 7 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-432/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9982Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Luxone Srl, agissant pour son propre compte et en qualité de mandataire du GME à constituer avec Iren Smart Solutions SpA and Sofein SpA, anciennement Gi One SpA v Consip SpA.#References for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 47(3) – Article 48(4) – Exclusion of a tenderer from the tender procedure – Exclusion of the possibility to reduce the initial membership of a temporary group of undertakings which has submitted a tender – Not compatible – Period of validity of a tender – Tender does not lapse at the end of its term – Obligation under the case-law to expressly withdraw that tender – Loss of the provisional security accompanying that tender – Automatic application of that measure – Article 2 – Principles relating to public procurement – Principle of proportionality – Principle of equal treatment – Obligation of transparency – Infringement.#Joined Cases C-403/23 and C-404/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9983Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Luxone Srl and Sofein SpA v Consip SpA.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#References for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 47(3) – Article 48(4) – Exclusion of a tenderer from the tender procedure – Exclusion of the possibility to reduce the initial membership of a temporary group of undertakings which has submitted a tender – Not compatible – Period of validity of a tender – Tender does not lapse at the end of its term – Obligation under the case-law to expressly withdraw that tender – Loss of the provisional security accompanying that tender – Automatic application of that measure – Article 2 – Principles relating to public procurement – Principle of proportionality – Principle of equal treatment – Obligation of transparency – Infringement.#Joined Cases C-403/23 and C-404/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9984Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Haut Conseil du commissariat aux comptes v MO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the formation restreinte du Haut Conseil du commissariat aux comptes.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Public authority not subject to regulation and/or oversight of statutory auditors – Internal organisational arrangements – Power to initiate infringement proceedings – Power to impose penalties – Decision against which an action for annulment may be brought – No status as ‘third party’ in relation to the authority having adopted the decision under judicial review – Inadmissibility.#Case C-368/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9985Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Association Trinationale de Protection Nucléaire (ATPN) v European Commission.#Case C-340/23 P.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9986Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Verbraucherzentrale Baden-Württemberg e.V. v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. OHG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Indication of the prices of products – Directive 98/6/EC – Article 6a – Price reduction announcements – Conditions – Concept of ‘prior price’ – Obligation to determine the announced price reduction on the basis of the prior price.#Case C-330/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9987Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Verbraucherzentrale Baden-Württemberg eV v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. OHG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Indication of the prices of products – Directive 98/6/EC – Article 6a – Price reduction announcements – Conditions – Concept of ‘prior price’ – Obligation to determine the announced price reduction on the basis of the prior price.#Case C-330/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9988Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Sozialversicherungsanstalt der Selbständigen v W M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Migrant workers – Social security – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 – Articles 13 and 14a – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 11 and Article 13(2) – Worker simultaneously pursuing an activity as a self-employed person in the territory of two or more States, including a Member State of the European Union, a State of the European Free Trade Association, which is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and the Swiss Confederation – Article 87(8) – Concept of ‘relevant situation’ – Agreement on the European Economic Area – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons.#Case C-329/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9989Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#VOLÁNBUSZ Zrt. v Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain provisions of social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 9(3) – Concept of ‘employer’s operational centre where the driver is normally based’ – Place where a driver takes charge of a vehicle falling within the scope of that regulation – Concept of ‘other work’ – Time spent by that driver driving a vehicle falling outside the scope of that regulation to travel to or from that operational centre.#Case C-164/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9990Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#VOLÁNBUSZ Zrt. v Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain provisions of social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 9(3) – Concept of ‘employer’s operational centre where the driver is normally based’ – Place where a driver takes charge of a vehicle falling within the scope of that regulation – Concept of ‘other work’ – Time spent by that driver driving a vehicle falling outside the scope of that regulation to travel to or from that operational centre.#Case C-164/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9991Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 26 September 2024.#Proceedings brought by B UG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 36(1) – Online purchase of excise goods in another Member State – Transport by a transporter recommended by the vendor – National rules regarding the vendor as liable for the excise duties chargeable in the Member State of destination.#Case C-596/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9992Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 September 2024.#Česká republika – Generální finanční ředitelství v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 31(1)(b) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Conditions – Technical reasons – Reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights – Attributable to the contracting authority – Factual and legal circumstances to be taken into consideration.#Case C-578/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9993Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 26 September 2024.#Athenian Brewery SA and Heineken NV v Macedonian Thrace Brewery SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Special jurisdiction – Article 8(1) – Multiple defendants – Claims ‘so closely connected’ that it is expedient to hear and determine them together – Article 102 TFEU – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent and subsidiary companies – Infringement committed by the subsidiary – Presumption of dominant influence exercised by the parent company – Joint and several liability – Decision of a national competition authority – Actions for compensation.#Case C-393/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9994Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 26 September 2024.#INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others and Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services – Articles 49 and 56 TFEU – Protocol (No 26) on services of general interest, annexed to the EU and FEU Treaties – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Scope – Monopolies and services of general economic interest – Requirements to be evaluated – Article 15 – Waste – Directive 2008/98/EC – Extended producer responsibility schemes – Articles 8 and 8a – Creation of a monopoly on the market for collective fulfilment of extended producer responsibility obligations – Non-profit-making single organisation – Article 106(2) TFEU – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Detailed rules for establishment and operation – Transitional arrangements – Obligation on producers subject to extended responsibility to comply with that scheme – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to conduct a business and right to property – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Proportionality.#Case C-254/23.cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9995Case C-550/23, Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – NV v Agentsia za darzhavna finansova inspektsia (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Directive 2014/24/EU – Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts – Contracting authority – Concept of body governed by public law – Application to a public contract the estimated value of which is less than the application thresholds of the directive)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9996Case C-432/23, Ordre des avocats du Barreau de Luxembourg: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative – Luxembourg) – F SCS, Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg v Administration des Contributions Directes (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Directive 2011/16/EU – Exchange of information on request – Decision ordering a lawyer to communicate information – Legal professional privilege – Article 7 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9997Joined Cases C-403/23 and C-404/23, Luxone and Others: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Luxone Srl, acting on its own behalf and as agent of the temporary group of undertakings to be formed with Iren Smart Solutions SpA (C-403/23), Sofein SpA, formerly Gi One SpA (C-404/23) v Consip SpA (References for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 47(3) – Article 48(4) – Exclusion of a tenderer from the tender procedure – Exclusion of the possibility to reduce the initial membership of a temporary group of undertakings which has submitted a tender – Not compatible – Period of validity of a tender – Tender does not lapse at the end of its term – Obligation under the case-law to expressly withdraw that tender – Loss of the provisional security accompanying that tender – Automatic application of that measure – Article 2 – Principles relating to public procurement – Principle of proportionality – Principle of equal treatment – Obligation of transparency – Infringement)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9998Case C-368/23, Fautromb: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Haut Conseil du commissariat aux comptes – France) – Haut Conseil du commissariat aux comptes v MO (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body – Exercise of judicial or administrative functions – Public authority not subject to regulation and/or oversight of statutory auditors – Internal organisational arrangements – Power to initiate infringement proceedings – Power to impose penalties – Decision against which an action for annulment may be brought – No status as third party in relation to the authority having adopted the decision under judicial review – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
9999Case C-340/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024 – Association Trinationale de Protection Nucléaire (ATPN) v European Commission (Appeal – Environment – Nuclear energy – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Action for annulment – Association whose purpose is to protect the population from any nuclear risk in the Upper Rhine and High Rhine region and to prevent the construction of new nuclear power plants in that region – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Condition that the applicant must be directly and individually concerned)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024
10000Case C-330/23, Aldi Süd: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Verbraucherzentrale Baden-Württemberg e.V. v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. OHG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Indication of the prices of products – Directive 98/6/EC – Article 6a – Price reduction announcements – Conditions – Concept of prior price – Obligation to determine the announced price reduction on the basis of the prior price)cjeu_case · 26 septembre 2024