9901Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#VC v European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.#Public procurement – Financial regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF for a period of two years – Publication of exclusion – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Grave professional misconduct – Decision of a national competition authority – Suspension by a national court – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Remedial measures – Unlimited jurisdiction – Manifest error of assessment – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-126/23.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9902Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 6 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Implementation of a judgment of the General Court – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-11/23.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9903Case T-606/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Soares v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents in the administrative file relating to a Commission State aid decision – Refusal of access – Exceptions relating to the protection of court proceedings and the purpose of investigations – General presumption of confidentiality – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9904Case T-126/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – VC v EU-OSHA (Exclusion from procurement procedures based on a suspended national administrative decision) (Public procurement – Financial regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF for a period of two years – Publication of exclusion – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Grave professional misconduct – Decision of a national competition authority – Suspension by a national court – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Remedial measures – Unlimited jurisdiction – Manifest error of assessment – Error of assessment – Proportionality)cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9905Case T-11/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – XH v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 6 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Implementation of a judgment of the General Court – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of impartiality – Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9906Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#ACE-Avocats, ensemble v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-828/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9907Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#ACE-Avocats, ensemble v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-828/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9908Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7, 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers.#Case T-798/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9909Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre des avocats à la cour de Paris and Julie Couturier v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7, 47 and 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers.#Case T-798/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9910Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-797/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9911Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Ordre néerlandais des avocats du barreau de Bruxelles and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on the provision of legal advisory services to the Russian Government and entities established in Russia – Fundamental role of lawyers in a democratic society – Right of lawyers to provide legal advisory services – Right to be advised by a lawyer – Articles 7 and 47 and Article 52(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Independence of lawyers – Rule of law – Proportionality – Legal certainty.#Case T-797/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9912Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9913Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9914Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-589/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9915Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-589/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9916Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-587/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9917Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-587/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9918Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#PW v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff.#Case T-448/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9919Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#PW v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Contract staff – Refusal to reimburse annual travel expenses for dependent children – Article 8(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Act adversely affecting an official – Decision which definitively lays down the position of the administration – Admissibility – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff.#Case T-448/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024
9920Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#TotalEnergies Marketing Nederland NV v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to identify the documents covered by the presumption and to provide a list of them.#Case T-332/22.cjeu_case · 2 octobre 2024