Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
9881

Case C-548/21, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeck (Attempt to access personal data stored on a mobile telephone): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol – Austria) – CG v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Landeck (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 3(2) – Concept of processing – Article 4 – Principles relating to processing of personal data – Article 4(1)(c) – Principle of data minimisation – Articles 7, 8, 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Requirement that a limitation on the exercise of a fundamental right must be provided for by law – Proportionality – Assessment of proportionality in the light of all the relevant factors – Prior review by a court or independent administrative authority – Article 13 – Information to be made available or given to the data subject – Limits – Article 54 – Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor – Police investigation in relation to narcotics trafficking – Attempt, by the police, to unlock a mobile telephone in order to gain access, for the purposes of that investigation, to the personal data stored in that telephone)

cjeu_case ·
9882

Case C-446/21, Schrems (Disclosure of data to the general public): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – Maximilian Schrems v Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd, formerly Facebook Ireland Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Online social networks – General terms of use relating to contracts concluded between a digital platform and a user – Personalised advertising – Article 5(1)(b) – Principle of purpose limitation – Article 5(1)(c) – Principle of data minimisation – Article 9(1) and (2) – Processing of special categories of personal data – Data concerning sexual orientation – Data which are made public by the data subject)

cjeu_case ·
9883

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment – First package of mobility measures (‘Mobility Package’) – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Maximum daily and weekly driving times – Minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods – Organisation of the work of drivers in such a way that they are able to return every three or four weeks, as the case may be, to their place of residence or to the operational centre of their employer to start or spend their regular or compensatory weekly rest period there – Prohibition of regular or compensatory weekly rest in the vehicle – Time limit for the installation of second generation (V2) intelligent tachographs – Date of entry into force – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Conditions relating to the requirement of establishment – Obligation to return the vehicle to the operational centre in the Member State of establishment – Obligation concerning the number of vehicles and drivers normally based at the operational centre of the Member State of establishment – Cabotage – Waiting period of four days for cabotage – Derogation for cabotage as part of combined transport operations – Directive (EU) 2020/1057 – Specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector – Transposition period – Internal market – Specific regime applicable to the freedom to provide transport services – Common transport policy – Articles 91 and 94 TFEU – Fundamental Freedoms – Principle of proportionality – Impact assessment – Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Protection of the environment – Article 11 TFEU – Consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions.#Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20.

cjeu_case ·
9884

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – First package of mobility measures (‘Mobility Package’) – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Maximum daily and weekly driving times – Minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods – Organisation of the work of the drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to return every three or four weeks, depending on the case, to their place of residence or to the operational centre of their employer to begin and spend their regular or compensatory weekly rest period – Prohibition on taking regular or compensatory weekly rest in the vehicle – Time limit for the installation of second generation (V2) smart tachographs – Date of entry into force – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Conditions relating to the requirement of establishment – Obligation to return the vehicle to the operational centre in the Member State of establishment – Obligation concerning the number of vehicles and drivers normally based at the operational centre of the Member State of establishment – Cabotage – Cooling-off period of four days for cabotage – Derogation for cabotage as part of combined transport operations – Directive (EU) 2020/1057 – Specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector – Transposition period – Internal market – Specific regime applicable to the freedom to provide transport services – Common transport policy – Articles 91 and 94 TFEU – Fundamental freedoms – Principle of proportionality – Impact assessment – Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Protection of the environment – Article 11 TFEU – Consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions.#Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20.

cjeu_case ·
9885

Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Mobility package – Posting and working time) (Action for annulment – First package of mobility measures (Mobility Package) – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Maximum daily and weekly driving times – Minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods – Organisation of the work of the drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to return every three or four weeks, depending on the case, to their place of residence or to the operational centre of their employer to begin and spend their regular or compensatory weekly rest period – Prohibition on taking regular or compensatory weekly rest in the vehicle – Time limit for the installation of second generation (V2) smart tachographs – Date of entry into force – Regulation (EU) 2020/1055 – Conditions relating to the requirement of establishment – Obligation to return the vehicle to the operational centre in the Member State of establishment – Obligation concerning the number of vehicles and drivers normally based at the operational centre of the Member State of establishment – Cabotage – Cooling-off period of four days for cabotage – Derogation for cabotage as part of combined transport operations – Directive (EU) 2020/1057 – Specific rules for posting drivers in the road transport sector – Transposition period – Internal market – Specific regime applicable to the freedom to provide transport services – Common transport policy – Articles 91 and 94 TFEU – Fundamental freedoms – Principle of proportionality – Impact assessment – Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Protection of the environment – Article 11 TFEU – Consultation of the European Economic and Social Committee and the European Committee of the Regions)

cjeu_case ·
9887

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 October 2024.#XH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Compliance with the judgment of 25 June 2020, XH v Commission (T-511/18, EU:T:2020:291) – Decision not to include the name of the appellant on the list of officials promoted as part of the 2021 promotion exercise – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-256/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
9888

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 October 2024.#XH v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Compliance with the judgment of 25 June 2020, XH v Commission (T-511/18, EU:T:2020:291) – Decision not to include the name of the appellant on the list of officials promoted as part of the 2021 promotion exercise – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-256/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
9895

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 October 2024.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-335/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
9896

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#X v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College voor de Rechten van de Mens.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ – College voor de Rechten van de Mens (Institute for Human Rights, Netherlands) – Compulsory jurisdiction – Non-binding decision – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-1/24.

cjeu_case ·
9897

Case C-1/24, Achmea Schadeverzekeringen: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the College voor de Rechten van de Mens – Netherlands) – X v Achmea Schadeverzekeringen NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court or tribunal – College voor de Rechten van de Mens (Institute for Human Rights, Netherlands) – Compulsory jurisdiction – Non-binding decision – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
9898

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Sara Soares v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents in the administrative file relating to a Commission State aid decision – Refusal of access – Exceptions relating to the protection of court proceedings and the purpose of investigations – General presumption of confidentiality – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-606/23.

cjeu_case ·
9899

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2024.#Sara Soares v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents in the administrative file relating to a Commission State aid decision – Refusal of access – Exceptions relating to the protection of court proceedings and the purpose of investigations – General presumption of confidentiality – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-606/23.

cjeu_case ·
9900

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#VC v European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.#Public supply contracts – Financial regulation – Exclusion from procurement procedures and from the award of grants financed by the general budget of the European Union and by the EDF for a period of two years – Publication of the exclusion – Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database – Serious professional misconduct – Decision of a national competition authority – Suspension by a national court – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Remedial measures – Unlimited jurisdiction – Manifest error of assessment – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-126/23.

cjeu_case ·