9721Case C-656/24, Prefettura di Bari and ANAC: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 8 October 2024 – U.T.G. Prefettura di Bari, Autorità nazionale anticorruzione (ANAC) v Dmeco Engineering Srl, Regione Puglia, BGcjeu_case · 8 octobre 2024
9722Case C-654/24, Bariello: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna (Italy) lodged on 8 October 2024 – M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Meritocjeu_case · 8 octobre 2024
9723Case T-520/24: Action brought on 7 October 2024 – CSL Behring v Commission and EMAcjeu_case · 7 octobre 2024
9724Case T-517/24: Action brought on 7 October 2024 – Froneri Bulgaria v EUIPO – DAESF (Box with lid)cjeu_case · 7 octobre 2024
9725Case T-516/24: Action brought on 7 October 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – R. Lopez de Heredia Viña Tondonia (LOPEZ DE HEREDIA)cjeu_case · 7 octobre 2024
9726Case C-653/24, Regione Emilia-Romagna: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale (Italy) lodged on 7 October 2024 – Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v Regione Emilia-Romagnacjeu_case · 7 octobre 2024
9727Case T-515/24: Action brought on 4 October 2024 – Lavrentiadis v EUIPO – Dalli-Werke (DALL)cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9729Case T-513/24: Action brought on 4 October 2024 – Lunar Outpost v EUIPO (LUNAR OUTPOST)cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9730Case T-512/24: Action brought on 4 October 2024 – Oberon Fuels v EUIPO – Dimeta (RDME)cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9732Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Accord Healthcare, SL v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Public health – Medicinal product for human use – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Degarelix Accord – Action for annulment – Time limits – Force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances – Dismissal.#Case C-599/24 P(I).cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9733Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Accord Healthcare SL v Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S and European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Public health – Medicinal product for human use – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Degarelix Accord – Action for annulment – Time limits – Force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances – Dismissal.#Case C-599/24 P(I).cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9734Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-503/24 P.cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9735Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-503/24 P.cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9736Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-502/24 P.cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9737Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-502/24 P.cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9738Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 4 October 2024.#Valeria Converso v Verla-Pharm Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG and Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-444/24 P.cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9739Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Valeria Converso v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-444/24 P.cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024
9740Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Criminal proceedings against KM and Sofiyska rayonna prokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/29/EU – Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime – Victim suffering from a physical or mental impairment – Procedural rights of that person – National rules not affording a victim access to the competent criminal court in order to claim infringement of his or her rights under EU law – Possibility for the victim to claim such infringement only before a civil court – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-255/24.cjeu_case · 4 octobre 2024