Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
9664

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-1056/23.

cjeu_case ·
9665

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-1056/23.

cjeu_case ·
9666

Case T-1056/23: Order of the General Court of 15 October 2024 – Pilatus Bank v ECB (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw the authorisation of the credit institution – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
9667

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or its development – Obligation for the national supreme court to consider, in proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law, whether a reference for a preliminary ruling should be made – Statement of reasons for the decision refusing leave to appeal on a point of law.#Case C-144/23.

cjeu_case ·
9668

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2024.#KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or its development – Obligation for the national supreme court to consider, in proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law, whether a reference for a preliminary ruling should be made – Statement of reasons for the decision refusing leave to appeal on a point of law.#Case C-144/23.

cjeu_case ·
9669

Case C-144/23, KUBERA: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije – Slovenia) – KUBERA, trgovanje s hrano in pijačo, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law to the supreme court of a Member State – Request by the party seeking leave to appeal on a point of law that a question concerning the interpretation of EU law be referred to the Court of Justice – National legislation under which leave to appeal on a point of law is to be granted if the appeal raises a question of law that is important for ensuring legal certainty, the uniform application of the law or its development – Obligation for the national supreme court to consider, in proceedings relating to the grant of leave to appeal on a point of law, whether a reference for a preliminary ruling should be made – Statement of reasons for the decision refusing leave to appeal on a point of law)

cjeu_case ·