9421Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a flat and round biscuit – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1048/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9422Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Vinatis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier national figurative mark VINITUS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-605/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9423Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Vinatis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier national figurative mark VINITUS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-605/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9424Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Sumol + Compal Marcas SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark FRUITOLOGY – Earlier national word mark CENTRO DE FRUTOLOGIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-523/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9425Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Sumol + Compal Marcas SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark FRUITOLOGY – Earlier national word mark CENTRO DE FRUTOLOGIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-523/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9426Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Keserű Művek Fegyvergyár Kft. v European Union, represented by the European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Implementing Directive (EU) 2019/69 – Causal link – Concept of ‘firearm’ – Concept ‘alarm and signal weapons’.#Case T-519/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9427Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Keserű Művek Fegyvergyár Kft. v European Union, represented by the European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Implementing Directive (EU) 2019/69 – Causal link – Concept of ‘firearm’ – Concept of ‘alarm and signal weapons’.#Case T-519/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9428Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Ümit İlbay v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PELLA – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-514/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9429Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Ümit İlbay v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PELLA – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-514/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9430Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Vladimir Gheorghe Plahotniuc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of actions destabilising Moldova – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criminal investigations and prosecutions initiated by the authorities of a third State – Obligation to verify that that decision observes the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-480/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9431Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Vladimir Gheorghe Plahotniuc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of actions destabilising Moldova – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criminal investigations and prosecutions initiated by the authorities of a third State – Obligation to verify that that decision observes the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-480/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9432Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Crescenzio Rivellini v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery by way of set-off of sums overpaid – Burden of proof – Limitation.#Case T-465/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9433Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Crescenzio Rivellini v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery by way of set-off of sums overpaid – Burden of proof – Limitation.#Case T-465/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9434Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#ePlus Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark E-Plus – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-463/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9435Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#ePlus Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark E-Plus – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-463/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9436Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#ePlus Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark E-Plus – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-462/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9437Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#ePlus Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark E-Plus – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-462/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9438Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Azaconsa SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark SHIP – Earlier EU figurative mark Sea Biscuits – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-332/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9439Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Azaconsa SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark SHIP – Earlier EU figurative mark Sea Biscuits – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-332/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024
9440Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Jima Projects v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing two parallel stripes on the side of a sports shoe – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to property – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-307/23.cjeu_case · 23 octobre 2024