Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
9246

Case C-241/24, Tsenochev: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Pleven, Bulgaria) – criminal proceedings against M. N. D., Y. G. Ts. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute or the proceedings in the main action and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
9253

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing an emblem – Earlier EU figurative marks representing a stripe – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the signs – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-544/23.

cjeu_case ·
9254

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing an emblem – Earlier EU figurative marks representing a stripe – Relative ground for refusal – No similarity of the signs – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-544/23.

cjeu_case ·
9257

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#ZB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ENERGY DRINK – Earlier EU figurative mark X Energy Drink – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-507/23.

cjeu_case ·
9258

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#ZB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ENERGY DRINK – Earlier EU figurative mark X Energy Drink – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-507/23.

cjeu_case ·
9259

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Consejo Regulador de la Indicación Geográfica Protegida «Aceite de Jaén» v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VEGA DEL OBISPO BIO Jaén PRODUCTOS ECOLOGICOS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 7(1)(f), (g) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of the evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-425/23.

cjeu_case ·
9260

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Consejo Regulador de la Indicación Geográfica Protegida 'Aceite de Jaén' v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VEGA DEL OBISPO BIO Jaén PRODUCTOS ECOLOGICOS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 7(1)(f), (g) and (j) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of the evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1), second sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-425/23.

cjeu_case ·