Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
9141

Case T-1127/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Butzkies-Schiemann v EUIPO – U.S. Corrosion Technologies (CorrosionX) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark CorrosionX – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Admissibility of the response filed before the Board of Appeal – Article 24(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

cjeu_case ·
9144

Case T-614/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Praha Alfa-Med v EUIPO – Rifetech (Apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis) (Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing apparatus and installations for medical or laboratory diagnosis – Prior design – Obligation to state reasons – No individual character – No different overall impression – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – Articles 4 to 6, Article 25(1)(b) and Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

cjeu_case ·
9147

Case T-524/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma v EUIPO – Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Europe (Shape of inhaler) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign which consists exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
9149

Case T-426/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Chiquita Brands v EUIPO – Compagnie financière de participation (Representation of a blue and yellow oval) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing a blue and yellow oval – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
9152

Case T-110/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Kargins v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents originating from a Member State – Documents relating to the Commission’s intervention in a dispute before the Supreme Court of Latvia – List of documents covered by the application for access to documents – Partial refusal of access – Objection by a Member State to disclosure of documents – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Obligation to state reasons – Presumption of legality attaching to EU measures – Review by the institution and by the EU Courts of the Member State’s grounds for objection – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Time limits provided for in Regulation No 1049/2001)

cjeu_case ·
9153

Case T-104/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – PAN Europe v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Preparatory documents of the Commission relating to a request for internal review of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2049 as regards the renewal of the approval of the active substance cypermethrin – Partial refusal to grant access – Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings)

cjeu_case ·
9154

Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2024 – Aesculap v EUIPO – Aeneas (AESKUCARE Food Intolerance, AESKUCARE and AESKUCARE Allergy) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for EU figurative marks AESKUCARE Food Intolerance and AESKUCARE Allergy and EU word mark AESKUCARE – Earlier EU and national word marks AESCULAP – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Cross-claims)

cjeu_case ·
9155

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Aboca SpA Soc. agr. and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-302/21.

cjeu_case ·
9156

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Aboca SpA Soc. agr. and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-302/21.

cjeu_case ·
9157

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Syndicat national des compléments alimentaires (Synadiet) and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-274/21.

cjeu_case ·
9158

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Syndicat national des compléments alimentaires (Synadiet) and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under control of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First, second and third entries in Article 1(1), and Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Concepts of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-274/21.

cjeu_case ·
9159

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Ortis v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First and second entries in Article 1(1), and first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Definition of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-271/21.

cjeu_case ·
9160

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 November 2024.#Ortis v European Commission.#Consumer protection – Substances prohibited, restricted or under EU scrutiny – Article 8(1) and (2) of, and Annex III to, Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – First and second entries in Article 1(1), and first and second entries in Article 1(2), of Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – Definition of ‘substance’, ‘ingredient’ and ‘preparations’ – Error of law.#Case T-271/21.

cjeu_case ·