8521Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#N. A. K. and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds for inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection of an application for international protection as inadmissible by a Member State due to the rejection of a previous application made in another Member State or the discontinuation of the procedure by another Member State in respect of the previous application.#Joined Cases C-123/23 and C-202/23.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8522Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#MK v K GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 88(1) and (2) – Processing in the context of employment – Employees’ personal data – More specific rules provided for by a Member State pursuant to that Article 88 – Obligation to comply with Article 5, Article 6(1) and Article 9(1) and (2) of that regulation – Processing on the basis of a collective agreement – Margin of discretion of the parties to the collective agreement as regards the necessity of the processing of personal data provided for by that agreement – Scope of judicial review.#Case C-65/23.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8523Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#MK v K GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 88(1) and (2) – Processing in the context of employment – Employees’ personal data – More specific rules provided for by a Member State pursuant to that Article 88 – Obligation to comply with Article 5, Article 6(1) and Article 9(1) and (2) of that regulation – Processing on the basis of a collective agreement – Margin of discretion of the parties to the collective agreement as regards the necessity of the processing of personal data provided for by that agreement – Scope of judicial review.#Case C-65/23.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8526Case C-664/23, Caisse d’allocations familiales des Hauts-de-Seine: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Versailles – France) – Caisse d’allocations familiales des Hauts-de-Seine v TX (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights of third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – National legislation determining entitlements to family benefits – Legislation excluding the taking into account of the minor children of the single permit holder for lack of evidence that they have entered the national territory lawfully)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8527Case C-601/23, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe): Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco – Spain) – Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd v Diputación Foral de Bizkaia (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation – Taxation of dividends – Withholding tax – Reimbursement of withholding tax, granted to resident dividend recipients that are loss-making at the end of the tax year in which the dividends are received – No reimbursement of the withholding tax to non-resident dividend recipients – Difference in treatment – Restriction – Comparability – Justification)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8528Case C-596/23, Pohjanri: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus – Finland) – proceedings brought by B UG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 36(1) – Online purchase of excise goods in another Member State – Transport by a transporter recommended by the vendor – National rules regarding the vendor as liable for the excise duties chargeable in the Member State of destination)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8529Case C-591/23, ZCC Europe: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – ZCC Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff classification – Headings 8113 and 8209 – Hard metal sticks made of cermets – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/910 – Validity – Classification criteria)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8530Case C-531/23, Loredas: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco – Spain) – HJ v US, MU (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Daily and weekly rest – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Articles 3, 5, 6, 16, 17, 19 and 22 – Requirement to establish a system enabling the duration of time worked by domestic workers to be measured – Derogation – National legislation exempting domestic workers from the obligation to record actual time worked)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8531Case C-392/23, Rustrans: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău – Romania) – Rustrans SRL v Ministerul Agriculturii şi Dezvoltării Rurale – Direcţia Generală Pescuit – Autoritatea de Management pentru POPAM (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Article 69 – Concept of eligible expenditure – Articles 4 and 125 – Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 – Article 48(1)(c) – Modernisation of an aquaculture unit – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Article 33 – Principle of sound financial management – Contribution in kind in the form of land and buildings located on that land – Direct link between the contribution in kind and the operation financed)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8532Case C-369/23, Vivacom Bulgaria: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad – Bulgaria) – Vivacom Bulgaria EAD v Varhoven administrativen sad, Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal – Liability of a Member State for damage caused to individuals by an infringement of EU law – Infringement by a national court adjudicating at last instance in relation to value added tax (VAT) – Jurisdiction of a court adjudicating at last instance while having the capacity of defendant in the dispute – Composition of the adjudicating panel)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8533Case C-295/23, Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Anwaltsgerichtshof – Germany) – Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft UG v Rechtsanwaltskammer München (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Establishing the applicable freedom – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Requirements which relate to the shareholding of a company – A purely financial investor’s holding in a law firm – Revocation of that law firm’s registration with the professional body on account of that holding – Restriction on freedom of establishment and on the free movement of capital – Justifications based on protecting the independence of lawyers and recipients of legal services – Necessity – Proportionality)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8534Case C-157/23, Ford Italia: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – Ford Italia SpA v ZP, Stracciari SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Liability for defective products – Directive 85/374/EEC – Article 3(1) – Concept of producer – Concept of a person who … presents him[- or her]self as … [a] producer – Conditions – Supplier whose name is the same in part as that of the producer and as the trade mark put on the product by the producer)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8535Joined Cases C-123/23 and C-202/23, Khan Yunis and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Minden – Germany) – N.A.K., E.A.K., Y.A.K. (C-123/23), M.E.O. (C-202/23) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds for inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of subsequent application – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection of an application for international protection as inadmissible by a Member State due to the rejection of a previous application made in another Member State or the discontinuation of the procedure by another Member State in respect of the previous application)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8536Case C-65/23, K GmbH (Processing of employees’ personal data): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht – Germany) – MK v K GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 88(1) and (2) – Processing in the context of employment – Employees’ personal data – More specific rules provided for by a Member State pursuant to that Article 88 – Obligation to comply with Article 5, Article 6(1) and Article 9(1) and (2) of that regulation – Processing on the basis of a collective agreement – Margin of discretion of the parties to the collective agreement as regards the necessity of the processing of personal data provided for by that agreement – Scope of judicial review)cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8537Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#„SISTEM LUX“ OOD and VU v Teritorialna direktsia Mitnitsa Burgas and Teritorialna direktsia Mitnitsa Burgas kam Agentsia „Mitnitsi“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 15 – Provision of information to the customs authorities – Failure to comply with the customs legislation – Article 42 – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Articles 2(1) – Confiscation – National provision providing for the imposition of a fine of between 100% and 200% of the customs value of the goods and confiscation thereof irrespective of the owner.#Joined Cases C-717/22 and C-372/23.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8538Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#„SISTEM LUX“ OOD and VU v Teritorialna direktsia Mitnitsa Burgas.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Svilengrad and Administrativen sad - Haskovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 15 – Provision of information to the customs authorities – Failure to comply with the customs legislation – Article 42 – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property – Articles 2(1) – Confiscation – National provision providing for the imposition of a fine of between 100% and 200% of the customs value of the goods and confiscation thereof irrespective of the owner.#Joined Cases C-717/22 and C-372/23.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8539Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#A and Others v Skatteministeriet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 370 – Point 2 of Part A of Annex X – Derogation – Scope – Activities of a public radio and television body financed by a compulsory fee paid by the owners of devices capable of receiving radio and television broadcasts.#Case C-573/22.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024
8540Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Teva BV and Teva Finland Oy v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v Clonmel Healthcare Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for obtaining an SPC for medicinal products – Article 3(a) – Concept of ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ – Article 3(c) – Concept of ‘product the subject of an SPC’ – Criteria for assessment.#Joined Cases C-119/22 and C-149/22.cjeu_case · 19 décembre 2024