Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
8403

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.

cjeu_case ·
8404

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.

cjeu_case ·
8405

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the figurative European Union trade mark €$ W Think for You – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-20/24.

cjeu_case ·
8406

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the figurative European Union trade mark €$ W Think for You – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-20/24.

cjeu_case ·
8410

Case T-163/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Rat Pack Filmproduktion v EUIPO – RatPac Entertainment (RATPAC) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
8411

Case T-20/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO (€$ We Think for You) (EU trade mark – Application for the figurative European Union trade mark €$ W Think for You – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
8417

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 January 2025.#Thomas Bindl v European Commission.#Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of ‘transfer of personal data to a third country’ – Transfer of data when visiting a website – EU Login – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – Position taken ending the inaction – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Non-material damage.#Case T-354/22.

cjeu_case ·
8418

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 January 2025.#Thomas Bindl v European Commission.#Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of ‘transfer of personal data to a third country’ – Transfer of data when visiting a website – EU Login – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – Position taken ending the inaction – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Non-material damage.#Case T-354/22.

cjeu_case ·
8420

Case T-354/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 January 2025 – Bindl v Commission (Processing of personal data – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Concept of transfer of personal data to a third country – Transfer of data when visiting a website – EU Login – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for failure to act – Position taken ending the inaction – No need to adjudicate – Action for damages – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Causal link – Non-material damage)

cjeu_case ·