8301Case T-69/25, A GmbH: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2025 – A v Hauptzollamt Ccjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8302Case T-21/25: Action brought on 15 January 2025 – Inescop v Commissioncjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8304Case T-19/25: Action brought on 15 January 2025 – Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe v Commissioncjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8305Case T-18/25: Action brought on 15 January 2025 – Apellis Europe v Commissioncjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8306Case C-20/25 P: Appeal brought on 15 January 2025 by Apc Europe SL, Apc Polska sp. z o.o., Veos NV, Veos Ibérica SL, Vapran SAS, Sonac Loenen BV, Sonac Uśnice sp. z o.o., Sonac Bad Bramstedt GmbH, Haripro SpA, EAPA against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 5 November 2024 in Case T-1194/23, Apc Europe and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8307Case C-18/25 P: Appeal brought on 15 January 2025 by Aeneas GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2024 in Joined Cases T-64/23 to T-66/23, Aesculap AG v European Union Intellectual Property Officecjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8308Case C-17/25, Società Cattolica di Assicurazione: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 15 January 2025 – LS, KV, RY, UJ, TM v Società Cattolica di Assicurazione SpAcjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8309Case C-14/25, Thüringer Aufbaubank: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 15 January 2025 – Thüringer Aufbaubank v LNcjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8310Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#Kokito I Punt, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing a rooster – Earlier figurative EU trade mark FFF – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-104/24.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8311Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#Kokito I Punt, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing a rooster – Earlier figurative EU trade mark FFF – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-104/24.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8312Case T-104/24: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – Kokito I Punt v EUIPO – Fédération française de football (Representation of a rooster) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing a rooster – Earlier figurative EU trade mark FFF – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8313Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#Enedo Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ENEDO – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-1142/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8314Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#Enedo Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ENEDO – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-1142/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8315Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Characteristics of the appearance of a product dictated exclusively by its technical function – Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Rights of the defence – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-1065/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8316Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Characteristics of the appearance of a product dictated exclusively by its technical function – Article 8(1) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Rights of the defence – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-1065/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8317Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Characteristics of the appearance of a product exclusively imposed by the technical function of that product – Articles 8(1) and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Rights of the defence – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-1064/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8318Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an accessory for a wireless remote control – Ground for invalidity – Characteristics of the appearance of a product exclusively imposed by the technical function of that product – Articles 8(1) and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Facts relied on or evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 and Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Rights of the defence – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Principle of sound administration – Article 41(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-1064/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8319Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#La Maison de l'Union syndicale v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Institutional law – Civil service – Promotion – Refusal to promote an official proposed by the Advisory Committee on Promotion – Professional association – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-581/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025
8320Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2025.#La Maison de l'Union syndicale v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Institutional law – Civil service – Promotion – Refusal to promote an official proposed by the Advisory Committee on Promotion – Professional association – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-581/23.cjeu_case · 15 janvier 2025