8241Case C-32/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 January 2025 by Domingo Alonso Group, SL against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 6 November 2024 in Case T-200/23, Domingo Alonso Group v EUIPO – Ald Automotive and Salvador Caetano Auto (my CARFLIX)cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2025
8242Case C-29/25, KOOPERATIVA: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 20 January 2025 – KOOPERATIVA poisťovňa, a.s. Vienna Insurance Group v O.A.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2025
8243Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 January 2025.#Tarek Kudsi Alattar v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Chamain – Earlier national word mark CHAMAIN – Admissibility of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Relative ground for invalidity – Comparison of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-259/24.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2025
8244Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 January 2025.#Tarek Kudsi Alattar v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Chamain – Earlier national word mark CHAMAIN – Admissibility of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Relative ground for invalidity – Comparison of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-259/24.cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2025
8245Case T-259/24: Order of the General Court of 20 January 2025 – Kudsi Alattar v EUIPO – Medelhavet Gross (Chamain) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Chamain – Earlier national word mark CHAMAIN – Admissibility of evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Relative ground for invalidity – Comparison of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/ 1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 20 janvier 2025
8246Case C-31/25 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2025 by Yavor Markov against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2024 in Case T-1050/23, Markov v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 janvier 2025
8249Case C-27/25, Knocknamona: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 17 January 2025 – SU, Wild Ireland Defence CLG v An Bord Pleanála and Others; Other party: Knocknamona Windfarm Limitedcjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8250Case C-26/25, Bukla: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 17 January 2025 – PQ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság, Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatalcjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8251Case C-25/25: Action brought on 17 January 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Bulgariacjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8252Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 January 2025.#DR and DS v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Person to whom the Staff Regulations apply – Inadmissibility.#Case T-182/24.cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8253Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 January 2025.#DR and DS v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Person to whom the Staff Regulations apply – Inadmissibility.#Case T-182/24.cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8254Case T-182/24: Order of the General Court of 17 January 2025 – DR and DS v EIOPA (Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Person to whom the Staff Regulations apply – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8255Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 January 2025.#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis for Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Duty to state reasons – Non-retroactivity – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-481/19.cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8256Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 January 2025.#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis for Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Duty to state reasons – Non-retroactivity – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-481/19.cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8257Case T-481/19: Order of the General Court of 17 January 2025 – Portigon v SRB (2019 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis for Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Duty to state reasons – Non-retroactivity – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8258Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 January 2025.#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for 2018 – Plea of illegality – Legal basis for Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Duty to state reasons – Non-retroactivity – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-413/18.cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8259Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 January 2025.#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for 2018 – Plea of illegality – Legal basis for Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Duty to state reasons – Non-retroactivity – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-413/18.cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025
8260Case T-413/18: Order of the General Court of 17 January 2025 – Portigon v SRB (2018 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for 2018 – Plea of illegality – Legal basis for Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Duty to state reasons – Non-retroactivity – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 17 janvier 2025