7961Case C-510/23, Trenitalia: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio – Italy) – Trenitalia SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market – Directive 2005/29/EC – Measures intended to combat such practices – Articles 11 and 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of consumer law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to issue a statement of objections within a time limit of 90 days of knowledge of the essential elements of the infringement – Automatic annulment in its entirety of the decision of the national authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Principle ne bis in idem – Revocation of the power to initiate new infringement proceedings in respect of the same facts – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings)cjeu_case · 30 janvier 2025
7962Case C-205/23, Engie Romania: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti – Romania) – Engie România SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în Domeniul Energiei (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 3(1) – Obligations of Member States towards natural gas undertakings – Consumer protection – Articles 40 and 41 – Powers of the regulatory authority – Breach by a natural gas undertaking of its duty of transparency towards consumers – Duplication of penalties for the same unlawful conduct – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence – Ne bis in idem – Article 52(1) – Limitations on the exercise of that fundamental right – Principle of proportionality)cjeu_case · 30 janvier 2025
7963Case T-321/21: Order of the General Court of 30 January 2025 – Lietuvos geležinkeliai v Commissioncjeu_case · 30 janvier 2025
7964Case T-80/25: Action brought on 29 January 2025 – Xpand Consortium and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7965Case T-73/25: Action brought on 29 January 2025 – Viva Credit v EUIPO – Viva Wallet (Viva)cjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7966Case T-68/25: Action brought on 29 January 2025 – Fundación Alianza por los Derechos, la Igualdad y la Solidaridad Internacional v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7967Case C-65/25, IFIS NPL INVESTING: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Brindisi (Italy) lodged on 29 January 2025 – IFIS NPL INVESTING SpA v JM, OT, VR, CLcjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7968Case C-64/25 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2025 by BT Solar d.o.o. and RC-Log d.o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 November 2024 in Case T-660/20, Zhejiang Beyondsun Green Energy Technology v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7969Case C-62/25, Staubsaugerservice: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2025 – Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v JZcjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7970Case C-61/25 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2025 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 20 November 2024 in Case T-508/22, Spain v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7971Case C-59/25 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2025 by Zhejiang Sunflower Great Health Co. Ltd, formerly Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Ltd, Sunowe Solar GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 November 2024 in Case T-733/19, Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology and Sunowe Solar v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7972Case C-58/25, Fremoluc and Association de Promotion des Droits Humains et des Minorités: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 29 January 2025 – Fremoluc NV, Association de Promotion des Droits Humains et des Minorités ASBL v Vlaamse Regeringcjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7973Case C-57/25: Action brought on 29 January 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Estoniacjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7974Case C-56/25, Petlichev: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 29 January 2025 – Criminal proceedings against MAcjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7975Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 January 2025.#Fashion Box SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark RE:PLAY – Earlier EU and national marks REPLAY and earlier international registrations of the mark REPLAY – Relative ground for refusal – Unfair advantage – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-164/24.cjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7976Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 January 2025.#Fashion Box SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark RE:PLAY – Earlier EU and national marks REPLAY and earlier international registrations of the mark REPLAY – Relative ground for refusal – Unfair advantage – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-164/24.cjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7977Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 January 2025.#Quality is Our Recipe LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Frosty – Earlier national figurative mark FROSTY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-168/24.cjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7978Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 January 2025.#Quality is Our Recipe LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Frosty – Earlier national figurative mark FROSTY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-168/24.cjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7979Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2025.#Doorinn GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU trade mark consisting of the position of a label on a mattress – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-147/24.cjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025
7980Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2025.#Doorinn GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU trade mark consisting of the position of a label on a mattress – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-147/24.cjeu_case · 29 janvier 2025