Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
7801

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025.#'Solvay Sodi' AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia 'Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Need for interpretation of EU law to enable the referring court to give judgment – None – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-784/22.

cjeu_case ·
7802

Case C-784/22, Solvay Sodi: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Varna – Bulgaria) – Solvay Sodi AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Need for interpretation of EU law to enable the referring court to give judgment – None – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
7803

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2025.#de Volksbank NV v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2018 contribution period – Articles 4, 14 and 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Principle of good administration.#Case T-406/18.

cjeu_case ·
7804

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2025.#de Volksbank NV v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2018 contribution period – Articles 4, 14 and 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Principle of good administration.#Case T-406/18.

cjeu_case ·
7805

Case T-406/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2025 – de Volksbank v SRB (2018 ex ante contributions) (Economic and Monetary Union – Banking Union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2018 contribution period – Articles 4, 14 and 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 – Principle of good administration)

cjeu_case ·
7815

Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
7816

Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
7817

Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
7818

Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.

cjeu_case ·