7661Case T-122/25: Action brought on 20 February 2025 – Wazdan Innovations v EUIPO (1 Coin)cjeu_case · 20 février 2025
7662Case C-153/25, Acea Produzione and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale (Italy) lodged on 20 February 2025 – Acea Produzione SpA and Otherscjeu_case · 20 février 2025
7663Case C-152/25 P: Appeal brought on 20 February 2025 by Hecht Pharma GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 18 December 2024 in Case T-520/23, Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Officecjeu_case · 20 février 2025
7664Case C-151/25, Viaudret: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 20 February 2025 – F.B. v Région wallonnecjeu_case · 20 février 2025
7665Case C-150/25, Marhaux: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance du Luxembourg (Belgium) lodged on 20 February 2025 – BX v État belgecjeu_case · 20 février 2025
7666Case C-749/24, Van Ratingen: Order of the Court of 20 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel – Belgium) – Van Ratingen NV v Versuni Holding BV, legal successor to Koninklijke Philips NV (Removal from the register)cjeu_case · 20 février 2025
7667Case T-121/25: Action brought on 19 February 2025 – Gharbi v Commissioncjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7668Case T-120/25: Action brought on 19 February 2025 – Corning v EUIPO – BCH Brühl (Pyrex)cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7669Case C-149/25, I Fly: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Council of State, Greece) lodged on 19 February 2025 – I Fly AEROPORIKES YPIRESIES ANONYMI ETAIREIA (I Fly SA), CYCLADESAIR AVIATION GmbH, CYCLADESAIR AVIATION GMBH ΥΠΟΚΑΤΑΣΤΗΜΑ ΑΛΛΟΔΑΠΗΣ (CYCLADIC) and Greenair Aviation GmbH (GreenAir) v Archi Politikis Aeroporias (A.P.A.)cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7670Order of the President of the General Court of 19 February 2025.#UF v European Commission.#Interim relief – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Termination of the contract – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to comply with a judgment of the General Court – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-502/24 R.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7671Order of the President of the General Court of 19 February 2025.#UF v European Commission.#Interim relief – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Termination of the contract – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to comply with a judgment of the General Court – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-502/24 R.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7672Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-103/24.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7673Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-103/24.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7674Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-102/24.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7675Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-102/24.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7676Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SCIO – Earlier non-registered mark SCIO – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-101/24.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7677Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 February 2025.#QX World Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SCIO – Earlier non-registered mark SCIO – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-101/24.cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7678Case T-502/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 February 2025 – UF v Commission (Interim relief – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Termination of the contract – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to comply with a judgment of the General Court – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7679Case T-103/24: Order of the General Court of 19 February 2025 – Qx World v EUIPO – Mandelay (EDUCTOR) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 19 février 2025
7680Case T-102/24: Order of the General Court of 19 February 2025 – Qx World v EUIPO – Mandelay (EDUCTOR) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark EDUCTOR – Earlier non-registered mark EDUCTOR – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 53(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Principle of functional continuity – Article 72(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Error of law – Criteria for assessing the well-known character of a mark – Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence produced – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 19 février 2025