7441Case T-90/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjeshappen nach Kolberger Art) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjeshappen nach Kolberger Art – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7442Case T-89/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński v EUIPO – Homann Feinkost (Matjesfilethappen nach Kolberger Art) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjesfilethappen nach Kolberger Art – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7443Case T-73/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Purwana v EUIPO (EAST INDIES GIN) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark EAST INDIES GIN – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7444Case T-26/24: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Funline International v EUIPO – MS Trade (JUNGLE JUICE) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE JUICE – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7445Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Funline International Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility.#Case T-1187/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7446Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Funline International Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility.#Case T-1187/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7447Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Enedo Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-1144/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7448Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Enedo Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application.#Case T-1144/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7449Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Funline International Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE PREMIUM – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility.#Case T-1135/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7450Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Funline International Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE PREMIUM – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility.#Case T-1135/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7451Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Summerbird A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark AMBER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1121/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7452Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Summerbird A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark AMBER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-1121/23.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7453Case T-1187/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Funline International v EUIPO – MS Trade (AMSTERDAM POPPERS) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7454Case T-1144/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Enedo v EUIPO – Enedis (Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Enedo RESHAPING ELECTRICITY – Earlier EU word mark ENEDIS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods and services covered in the trade mark application)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7455Case T-1135/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Funline International v EUIPO – MS Trade (JUNGLE PREMIUM) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE PREMIUM – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7456Case T-1121/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Summerbird v EUIPO – Puratos (AMBER) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark AMBER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7457Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Alexander Ponomarenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially Russian decision-makers’ – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145 – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence – Duty to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Equal treatment.#Case T-249/22.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7458Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Alexander Ponomarenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially Russian decision-makers’ – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145 – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence – Duty to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Equal treatment.#Case T-249/22.cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7459Case T-249/22: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Ponomarenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or subject to restrictions on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of supporting, materially or financially Russian decision-makers – Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of association – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145 – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Rights of the defence – Duty to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 5 mars 2025
7460Case T-198/25, G Kft.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 4 March 2025 – G Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóságacjeu_case · 4 mars 2025