Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
7221

Case C-137/23, Alsen: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – the Netherlands) – X v Staatssecretaris van Finaciën (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Exemption of energy products used as fuel – Article 14(1)(c) – Navigation within EU waters – Article 15(1)(f) – Navigation on inland waterways – Directive 95/60/EC – Fiscal marking of gas oils and kerosene – Gas oil, to which fiscal marking has not been applied in accordance with EU law, intended for use for the propulsion of a vessel – Refusal to apply the exemption from payment of excise duty – Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
7222

Case C-72/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025 – Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
7223

Case C-44/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025 – Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union (Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
7224

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd and Astra Vagoane Călători SA v Autoritatea pentru Reformă Feroviară and Alstom Ferroviaria SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 25 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right for those economic operators to ‘no less favourable treatment’ – Exclusion of such an economic operator from a public procurement procedure, pursuant to national legislation – Exclusive competence of the Union.#Case C-266/22.

cjeu_case ·
7225

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd and Astra Vagoane Călători SA v Autoritatea pentru Reformă Feroviară and Alstom Ferroviaria SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 25 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right for those economic operators to ‘no less favourable treatment’ – Exclusion of such an economic operator from a public procurement procedure, pursuant to national legislation – Exclusive competence of the Union.#Case C-266/22.

cjeu_case ·
7226

Case C-266/22, CRRC Qingdao Sifang and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București – Romania) – CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd, Astra Vagoane Călători SA v Autoritatea pentru Reformă Feroviară, Alstom Ferroviaria SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 25 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right for those economic operators to no less favourable treatment – Exclusion of such an economic operator from a public procurement procedure, pursuant to national legislation – Exclusive competence of the European Union)

cjeu_case ·
7238

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Coopservice soc. coop. p.a v Consip SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-285/24.

cjeu_case ·
7239

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025.#Coopservice soc. coop. p.a v Consip SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-285/24.

cjeu_case ·
7240

Case C-285/24, Coopservice: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl v Consip SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·