Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
6805

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2025.#Criminal proceedings against I.R.O. and F.J.L.R.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 42(1) – Procedural measures intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review, by national courts, in accordance with the requirements and procedures provided for in national law – Scope – Witness summons – National law not permitting direct judicial review of such a measure – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-292/23.

cjeu_case ·
6806

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2025.#Criminal proceedings against I.R.O. and F.J.L.R.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Central de Instrucción n° 6 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 42(1) – Procedural measures intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review, by national courts, in accordance with the requirements and procedures provided for in national law – Scope – Witness summons – National law not permitting direct judicial review of such a measure – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-292/23.

cjeu_case ·
6807

Case C-292/23, European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Judicial review of procedural acts): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Central de Instrucción no 6 de Madrid – Spain) – Criminal proceedings against I.R.O., F.J.L.R. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 42(1) – Procedural measures intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review, by national courts, in accordance with the requirements and procedures provided for in national law – Scope – Witness summons – National law not permitting direct judicial review of such a measure – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

cjeu_case ·
6813

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Kingspan Group plc v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Competition – Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Procedure to impose penalties on parties to a proposed concentration for providing incomplete, incorrect or misleading information in the course of a European Commission investigation – Decision of the Commission’s Hearing Officer to refuse access to certain documents in the investigation file relating to that proposed concentration – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-507/24.

cjeu_case ·
6814

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Kingspan Group plc v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Competition – Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Procedure to impose penalties on parties to a proposed concentration for providing incomplete, incorrect or misleading information in the course of a European Commission investigation – Decision of the Commission’s Hearing Officer to refuse access to certain documents in the investigation file relating to that proposed concentration – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-507/24.

cjeu_case ·
6815

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark JUST SLIP IN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-295/24.

cjeu_case ·
6816

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark JUST SLIP IN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-295/24.

cjeu_case ·
6817

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark HANDS FREE FIT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-254/24.

cjeu_case ·
6818

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark HANDS FREE FIT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-254/24.

cjeu_case ·
6819

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HOODLESS HOODIES – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-206/24.

cjeu_case ·
6820

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HOODLESS HOODIES – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-206/24.

cjeu_case ·