Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
6541

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#SBK Art OOO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-102/23.

cjeu_case ·
6543

Case T-202/23: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Kivikoski and Others v Council (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2022 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 8 – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Demonstration of the prospect of promotion – Admissibility – Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations – Guiding multiplication rates – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits)

cjeu_case ·
6544

Case T-102/23: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – SBK Art v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of association – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
6547

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#FG v Caja Rural de Navarra SCC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Articles 3 to 5 – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreements – Term concerning loan arrangement fees – Application seeking a declaration of invalidity of that term – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Plainness and intelligibility of the terms.#Case C-699/23.

cjeu_case ·
6548

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#FG v Caja Rural de Navarra SCC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 8 de Donostia – San Sebastián.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Articles 3 to 5 – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreements – Term concerning loan arrangement fees – Application seeking a declaration of invalidity of that term – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Plainness and intelligibility of the terms.#Case C-699/23.

cjeu_case ·
6549

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#ZH and KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Leasing agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Articles 6 and 7 – Unfair term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Effects of the annulment of the contract in its entirety.#Case C-630/23.

cjeu_case ·
6550

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#ZH and KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Leasing agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Articles 6 and 7 – Unfair term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Effects of the annulment of the contract in its entirety.#Case C-630/23.

cjeu_case ·
6551

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Finanzamt für Großbetriebe v Franklin Mutual Series Funds - Franklin Mutual European Fund.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Restrictions – Tax on income from capital – Undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – Legal personality – National legislation providing that UCITS do not have legal personality – Tax transparency of UCITS – Tax treatment of foreign undertakings that are comparable to UCITS but that have legal personality – Whether a cross-border situation is comparable to a domestic situation.#Case C-602/23.

cjeu_case ·
6552

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Finanzamt für Großbetriebe v Franklin Mutual Series Funds - Franklin Mutual European Fund.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Restrictions – Tax on income from capital – Undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – Legal personality – National legislation providing that UCITS do not have legal personality – Tax transparency of UCITS – Tax treatment of foreign undertakings that are comparable to UCITS but that have legal personality – Whether a cross-border situation is comparable to a domestic situation.#Case C-602/23.

cjeu_case ·
6553

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Fertilizers Europe and European Commission v AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Request for an expiry review of anti-dumping measures – Time limit laid down in that provision for making such a request – Sufficiency of the evidence – Information submitted after the expiry of that time limit.#Joined Cases C-554/23 P and C-568/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
6554

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Fertilizers Europe and European Commission v AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duties – Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Request for an expiry review of anti-dumping measures – Time limit laid down in that provision for making such a request – Sufficiency of the evidence – Information submitted after the expiry of that time limit.#Joined Cases C-554/23 P and C-568/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
6555

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance – Article 11(1)(b) – Article 13(2) – Action brought by an injured party directly against an insurer – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Official injured in a road traffic accident – Continued remuneration during that official’s incapacity to work – Member State acting as the employer subrogated to that official’s rights to compensation – Jurisdiction of the courts for the place where the claimant is domiciled – Place where the administrative body employing that official has its seat.#Case C-536/23.

cjeu_case ·
6556

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Mutua Madrileña Automovilista.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance – Article 11(1)(b) – Article 13(2) – Action brought by an injured party directly against an insurer – Concept of ‘injured party’ – Official injured in a road traffic accident – Continued remuneration during that official’s incapacity to work – Member State acting as the employer subrogated to that official’s rights to compensation – Jurisdiction of the courts for the place where the claimant is domiciled – Place where the administrative body employing that official has its seat.#Case C-536/23.

cjeu_case ·
6557

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Novel Nutriology GmbH v Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 – Nutrition and health claims made on foods – Article 10(1) and (3) – Specific conditions applicable to health claims – Articles 13 and 14 – Lists of authorised health claims – Article 28(5) and (6) – Transitional measures – Advertising promoting a food supplement using health claims relating to botanical substances contained in that supplement – Health claims the evaluation of which has been suspended by the European Commission – Applicability of Regulation No 1924/2006.#Case C-386/23.

cjeu_case ·
6558

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Novel Nutriology GmbH v Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 – Nutrition and health claims made on foods – Article 10(1) and (3) – Specific conditions applicable to health claims – Articles 13 and 14 – Lists of authorised health claims – Article 28(5) and (6) – Transitional measures – Advertising promoting a food supplement using health claims relating to botanical substances contained in that supplement – Health claims the evaluation of which has been suspended by the European Commission – Applicability of Regulation No 1924/2006.#Case C-386/23.

cjeu_case ·
6559

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Proceedings brought by Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Judicial body competent to propose the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against judges, public prosecutors and investigating magistrates, with a view to the imposition of disciplinary penalties – Members of the judicial body remaining in office after the expiry of their term of office – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data security – Access by a judicial body to data relating to the bank accounts of judges and public prosecutors and of their family members – Judicial authorisation for the purpose of lifting banking secrecy – Court authorising the lifting of banking secrecy – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Article 51 – Concept of ‘supervisory authority’.#Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23.

cjeu_case ·
6560

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Judicial body competent to propose the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against judges, public prosecutors and investigating magistrates, with a view to the imposition of disciplinary penalties – Members of the judicial body remaining in office after the expiry of their term of office – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Data security – Access by a judicial body to data relating to the bank accounts of judges and public prosecutors and of their family members – Judicial authorisation for the purpose of lifting banking secrecy – Court authorising the lifting of banking secrecy – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Article 51 – Concept of ‘supervisory authority’.#Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23.

cjeu_case ·