Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
5821

Case T-781/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Madre Querida and Others v Commission (Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
5822

Case T-681/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Spain v Commission (Common Fisheries Policy – Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2336 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1614 – Methods and criteria for determining areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems are known to occur or are likely to occur – Establishment of a list of areas where the presence of vulnerable marine ecosystems is proven or probable – Establishment of buffer zones – Plea of illegality – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
5826

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 June 2025.#Blue Underwriting Agency SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-134/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
5827

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 10 juin 2025.#Blue Underwriting Agency SpA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-134/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
5829

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 10 juin 2025.#Domingo Alonso Group, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-32/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
5833

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2025.#Nidec Asi SpA and Ceisis SpA Sistemi Impiantistici Integrati v Ministero per gli Affari europei, Politiche di coesione e Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU – Articles 39, 70 and 75 – Right of access to a technical tender in its entirety – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to a contracting entity by an economic operator – Protection of trade secrets – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-686/24.

cjeu_case ·
5834

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2025.#Nidec Asi SpA and Ceisis SpA Sistemi Impiantistici Integrati v Ministero per gli Affari europei, Politiche di coesione e Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU – Articles 39, 70 and 75 – Right of access to a technical tender in its entirety – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to a contracting entity by an economic operator – Protection of trade secrets – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-686/24.

cjeu_case ·
5835

Case C-686/24, Nidec Asi and Ceisis: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Nidec Asi SpA, Ceisis SpA Sistemi Impiantistici Integrati v Ministero per gli Affari europei and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Public procurement – Directive 2014/25/EU – Articles 39, 70 and 75 – Right of access to a technical tender in its entirety – Protection of the confidentiality of information submitted to a contracting entity by an economic operator – Protection of trade secrets – Effective judicial protection)

cjeu_case ·
5836

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Effective judicial protection – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Margin of discretion of the SRB – Plea of illegality – Margin of discretion of the Commission – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-480/19.

cjeu_case ·
5837

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Effective judicial protection – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Margin of discretion of the SRB – Plea of illegality – Margin of discretion of the Commission – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-480/19.

cjeu_case ·
5838

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Cap provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-479/19.

cjeu_case ·
5839

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 June 2025.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Determination of the annual target level – Cap provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Plea of illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-479/19.

cjeu_case ·
5840

Case T-480/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2025 – Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB (2019 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2019 ex ante contributions – Obligation to state reasons – Effective judicial protection – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Margin of discretion of the SRB – Plea of illegality – Margin of discretion of the Commission – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·