5744Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 12 June 2025.#Michael Heßler v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Pre-litigation procedure – Article 90 – Concept of an act adversely affecting an official – Tax for the benefit of the European Union – Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 – Article 3 – Tax abatement for a dependent child – Conditions for granting – Concept of ‘dependent child’ – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Article 2 – Dependent child allowance.#Case C-137/24 P.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5746Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 12 June 2025.###cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5747Case C-815/24, Diamond Resorts Europe: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – Diamond Resorts Europe Limited (Sucursal en España) v M.D. and J.D. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer which can be clearly deduced from the case-law – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Special jurisdiction – Article 7(5) – Concepts of branch agency or other establishment – Action seeking the annulment of timeshare contracts for the use of immovable property)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5748Case C-219/24, Tallinna linn: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus – Estonia) – A and Others v Tallinna linn (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work – Articles 5, 6 and 9 – Obligations on employers – Directive 2000/54/EC – Protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work – Article 14(3) – Health surveillance – Making available of effective vaccines – Annex VII, points 1 and 2 – National legislation allowing employers to require workers who are exposed to a biological risk to undergo vaccination – SARS-CoV-2 virus)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5749Case C-125/24, Palmstråle: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen – Sweden) – AA v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – VAT exemption – Article 143(1)(e) – Reimportation of goods – Condition relating to exemption from customs duty on the importation of returned goods – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 86(6) and Article 203 – Incurrence of a customs debt as a result of failure to comply with a formal obligation laid down in the customs legislation – Cases where such a debt is incurred)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5750Case C-7/24, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Nord and BG Verkehr: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Retten i Svendborg – Denmark) – Deutsche Rentenversicherung Nord, BG Verkehr v Gjensidige Forsikring, Danish subsidiary of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, Norway, as representative of Marius Pedersen A/S, Gjensidige Forsikring, Danish subsidiary of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA, Norway (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Coordination of social security systems – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 85(1) – Benefits payable under the legislation of a Member State for injury sustained in the territory of another Member State – Right of action of the institutions responsible for providing benefits against a liable third party – Rights of the injured party – Subrogation – Limits)cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5751Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#MTÜ Eesti Suurkiskjad v Keskkonnaamet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – First subparagraph of Article 1(i) – Conservation status of a species – Concept – Article 14 – Management measures – Taking in the wild and exploitation compatible with the maintenance or restoration of the species at a favourable conservation status – Second subparagraph of Article 1(i) – Assessment whether the conservation status of the species concerned is favourable – Cumulative conditions – Canis lupus (wolf) – Classification in the ‘vulnerable’ category of the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s ‘Red List’ – Animal species forming part of a population whose natural range extends beyond the territory of a Member State – Taking account of exchanges with populations of the same species present in neighbouring Member States or in third countries – Article 2(3) – Taking account of economic, social and cultural requirements and regional and local characteristics.#Case C-629/23.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5752Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#MTÜ Eesti Suurkiskjad v Keskkonnaamet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – First subparagraph of Article 1(i) – Conservation status of a species – Concept – Article 14 – Management measures – Taking in the wild and exploitation compatible with the maintenance or restoration of the species at a favourable conservation status – Second subparagraph of Article 1(i) – Assessment whether the conservation status of the species concerned is favourable – Cumulative conditions – Canis lupus (wolf) – Classification in the ‘vulnerable’ category of the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s ‘Red List’ – Animal species forming part of a population whose natural range extends beyond the territory of a Member State – Taking account of exchanges with populations of the same species present in neighbouring Member States or in third countries – Article 2(3) – Taking account of economic, social and cultural requirements and regional and local characteristics.#Case C-629/23.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5753Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#OHB System AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – Procurement of Galileo transition satellites – Competitive dialogue – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract concerned to other tenderers.#Case C-415/23 P.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5754Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#OHB System AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – Procurement of Galileo transition satellites – Competitive dialogue – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract concerned to other tenderers.#Case C-415/23 P.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5755Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning.#Case C-364/23 P.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5756Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning.#Case C-364/23 P.cjeu_case · 12 juin 2025
5760Case C-656/23, Karaman: Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Haarlem – Netherlands) – B v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheidcjeu_case · 12 juin 2025