5541Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi.#Case C-469/23 P.cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5542Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi.#Case C-466/23 P.cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5543Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi.#Case C-466/23 P.cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5544Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Concentration between undertakings – Market for the generation and wholesale supply of electricity – Acquisition by RWE AG of E.ON SE’s renewable and nuclear electricity generation assets – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992.#Joined Cases C-464/23 P, C-465/23 P, C-467/23 P, C-468/23 P and C-470/23 P.cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5545Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Concentration between undertakings – Market for the generation and wholesale supply of electricity – Acquisition by RWE AG of E.ON SE’s renewable and nuclear electricity generation assets – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992.#Joined Cases C-464/23 P, C-465/23 P, C-467/23 P, C-468/23 P and C-470/23 P.cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5546Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 26 June 2025.#A. M. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Obligation to state reasons for the concrete application of those exceptions – National legislation conferring on the national court or tribunal of last instance the power to dismiss actions by means of a summary statement of reasons – Conditions required to reason a refusal to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-767/23.cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5548Joined Cases C-776/23 P to C-780/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – Commission v Spain and Others (Indirect shareholdings) (Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdings – Legal certainty)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5549Case C-759/23, PJ Carroll and Nicoventures Trading: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court – Ireland) – PJ Carroll & Company Ltd, Nicoventures Trading Ltd v The Minister for Health, Ireland, The Attorney General (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 7(12) – Article 11(6) – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Validity – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Novel tobacco products – Heated tobacco products – Power to withdraw exemptions from prohibitions of flavourings and labelling requirements – Substantial change of circumstances)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5550Case C-618/23, SALUS: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – SALUS Haus Dr. med. Otto Greither Nachf. GmbH & Co. KG v Astrid Twardy GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 1(29) – Article 16a – Traditional herbal medicinal products – Article 62 – Information which is useful to the patient – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 2(1) – Scope – Indications on the outer packaging of a medicinal herbal tea – Use of terms referring to organic production)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5551Joined Cases C-555/23 and C-556/23, Makeleio and Zougla: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias – Greece) – Makeleio EPE (C-555/23), Zougla G.R. AE (C-556/23) v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis (ESR) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media service providers – National legislation requiring respect for human dignity and prohibiting the broadcasting of content of poor quality – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – Limits – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Principle of legal certainty)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5552Case C-485/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – enercity v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5553Case C-484/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – Mainova v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5554Case C-469/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – eins energie in sachsen v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5555Joined Cases C-464/23 P, C-465/23 P, C-467/23 P, C-468/23 P and C-470/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission (Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Concentration between undertakings – Market for the generation and wholesale supply of electricity – Acquisition by RWE AG of E.ON SE’s renewable and nuclear electricity generation assets – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the functioning of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992)cjeu_case · 26 juin 2025
5557Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-146/25 P.cjeu_case · 25 juin 2025
5558Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-146/25 P.cjeu_case · 25 juin 2025
5559Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-145/25 P.cjeu_case · 25 juin 2025
5560Order of the Court of 25 June 2025.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-145/25 P.cjeu_case · 25 juin 2025