Catalogue des documents juridiques

104314 documents
521

Case C-10/24, Dürr Dental: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Dürr Dental SE v Cattani Deutschland Helmes GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – CE marking of a medical device falling under risk class IIa – Oil-free dry air compressors for the production of compressed air for dental treatment – Making available on the market – Obligations of distributors – Verification of the classification as a medical device where the manufacturer has affixed a CE marking to the device in question as machinery)

cjeu_case ·
522

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#AR and Procureur général de Mons v HL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Grounds for refusal of execution – Risk of the requested person suffering inhuman or degrading treatment prohibited by Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution – Undertaking of the executing Member State to enforce the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters – Article 4(5) – Request by the executing Member State to the issuing Member State to forward to it the judgment imposing a custodial sentence with a view to enforcing that sentence on its territory.#Joined Cases C-722/23 and C-91/24.

cjeu_case ·
523

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#AR and Procureur général de Mons v HL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Grounds for refusal of execution – Risk of the requested person suffering inhuman or degrading treatment prohibited by Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution – Undertaking of the executing Member State to enforce the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters – Article 4(5) – Request by the executing Member State to the issuing Member State to forward to it the judgment imposing a custodial sentence with a view to enforcing that sentence on its territory.#Joined Cases C-722/23 and C-91/24.

cjeu_case ·
524

Joined Cases C-722/23 and C-91/24, Rugu and Aucroix: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Cassation – Belgium) – proceedings relating to the execution of European arrest warrants (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Grounds for refusal of execution – Risk of the requested person suffering inhuman or degrading treatment prohibited by Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution – Undertaking of the Member State to enforce the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters – Article 4(5) – Request by the executing Member State to the issuing Member State to forward to it the judgment imposing a custodial sentence with a view to enforcing that sentence on its territory)

cjeu_case ·
531

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Kinova Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 9021 – Orthopaedic appliances – Other appliances which are worn or carried, or implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability – Robotic arm attached to an electric wheelchair.#Case T-313/25.

cjeu_case ·
532

Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 3 juin 2026.#Societatea Română de Endocrinologie contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC), The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology/Registered in 1938 New series – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Absence de similitude des produits et des services – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-307/25.

cjeu_case ·
533

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Societatea Română de Endocrinologie v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Acta Endocrinologica (Buc) – Earlier EU word mark ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA (BUC), The International Journal of Romanian Society of Endocrinology / Registered in 1938 New series – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-307/25.

cjeu_case ·
536

Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 3 juin 2026.#Osculati Srl contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Enregistrement international désignant l’Union européenne – Marque figurative O – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative antérieure O – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Faits invoqués ou preuves produites pour la première fois devant la chambre de recours – Article 95, paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-267/25.

cjeu_case ·
537

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Osculati Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark O – Earlier EU figurative mark O – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/25.

cjeu_case ·
538

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#VÁM4ALL Kft. "felszámolás alatt" v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Declared transaction value – Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 140 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 – Secondary methods – Article 74 of Regulation No 952/2013 – Residual or ‘fall-back’ method – Article 144 of Implementing Regulation 2015/2447 – Importation of bulk goods – Lack of proof of actual payment – Insufficient data on the essential characteristics of the goods – Use of data available in the national database – Simple arithmetic mean of unit prices.#Case T-224/25.

cjeu_case ·
539

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#G Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Directive 2006/112/EC – Adjustment of VAT improperly invoiced – Transactions relating to a period closed by a tax inspection – National legislation making the initiation of a new inspection subject to a new fact updated by the taxpayer – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of tax neutrality – Proportionality.#Case T-198/25.

cjeu_case ·
540

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 3 June 2026.#Lami Packaging (Kunshan) Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional mark – Shape of octagonal carton – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Manufacturing process – Use of the product – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.#Case T-104/25.

cjeu_case ·