Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
5281

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Spin Master Toys UK Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-1170/23.

cjeu_case ·
5283

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Hala Almaghout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment.#Case T-437/23.

cjeu_case ·
5284

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Hala Almaghout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment.#Case T-437/23.

cjeu_case ·
5285

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2025 (Extracts).#LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz GmbH, anciennement Borealis Agrolinz Melamine Deutschland GmbH and Cornerstone Chemical Co. v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Ultra vires – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Misuse of powers.#Case T-167/23.

cjeu_case ·
5286

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2025 (Extracts).#LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz GmbH, anciennement Borealis Agrolinz Melamine Deutschland GmbH and Cornerstone Chemical Co. v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Ultra vires – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Misuse of powers.#Case T-167/23.

cjeu_case ·
5287

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2025 (Extracts).#LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz GmbH, anciennement Borealis Agrolinz Melamine Deutschland GmbH and Cornerstone Chemical Co. v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Ultra vires – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Misuse of powers.#Case T-167/23.

cjeu_case ·
5288

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Fritz Egger GmbH & Co. OG and Others v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Ultra vires – Proportionality.#Case T-163/23.

cjeu_case ·
5289

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Fritz Egger GmbH & Co. OG and Others v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Ultra vires – Proportionality.#Case T-163/23.

cjeu_case ·
5291

Case T-1173/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Spin Master Toys UK v EUIPO – Verdes Innovations (Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

cjeu_case ·
5292

Case T-1172/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Spin Master Toys UK v EUIPO – Verdes Innovations (Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

cjeu_case ·
5293

Case T-1171/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Spin Master Toys UK v EUIPO – Verdes Innovations (Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

cjeu_case ·
5294

Case T-1170/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Spin Master Toys UK v EUIPO – Verdes Innovations (Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a cube with faces having a grid structure and differentiated by their colours – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

cjeu_case ·
5296

Case T-437/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Almaghout v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
5297

Case T-167/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz and Cornerstone v ECHA (Melamine) (REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Ultra vires – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Misuse of powers)

cjeu_case ·
5298

Case T-163/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Fritz Egger and Others v ECHA (Melamine) (REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Ultra vires – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·