Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
5221

Case C-635/23, WBS GmbH: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht – Germany) – Criminal proceedings (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European Investigation Order (EIO) – Directive 2014/41/EU – Article 2(c)(ii) – Concept of other competent authority acting in its capacity as an investigating authority in criminal proceedings – Competence to order the gathering of evidence in accordance with national law – Search measures requiring the authorisation of an investigating judge – Article 6(1) and (2) – Conditions for issuing an EIO)

cjeu_case ·
5222

Case C-254/23, INTERZERO and Others: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 July 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije – Slovenia) – INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others, Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others v Državni zbor Republike Slovenije (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services – Articles 49 and 56 TFEU – Protocol (No 26) on services of general interest, annexed to the EU and FEU Treaties – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Scope – Monopolies and services of general economic interest – Requirements to be evaluated – Article 15 – Waste – Directive 2008/98/EC – Extended producer responsibility schemes – Articles 8 and 8a – Creation of a monopoly on the market for collective fulfilment of extended producer responsibility obligations – Non-profit-making single organisation – Article 106(2) TFEU – Concept of an undertaking – Detailed rules for establishment and operation – Transitional arrangements – Obligation on producers subject to extended responsibility to comply with that scheme – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to conduct a business and right to property – Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations – Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
5223

Case C-212/23: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 July 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive (EU) 2019/789 – Copyright and related rights – Rules on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and retransmissions of television and radio programmes – Partial transposition – Article 260(3) TFEU – Financial penalties – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Date on which the infringement was brought to an end)

cjeu_case ·
5229

Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 9 July 2025.#MK v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 7 – Chargeability of excise duty – Release for consumption – Energy products – Whether excise duty arises – Fictitious supply of excise goods appearing on falsified invoices.#Case T-534/24.

cjeu_case ·
5230

Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 9 July 2025.#MK v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Osijeku.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 7 – Chargeability of excise duty – Release for consumption – Energy products – Whether excise duty arises – Fictitious supply of excise goods appearing on falsified invoices.#Case T-534/24.

cjeu_case ·
5231

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark +a – Earlier EU figurative mark A+ – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-407/24.

cjeu_case ·
5232

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark +a – Earlier EU figurative mark A+ – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-407/24.

cjeu_case ·
5233

Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 9 juillet 2025.#Kinda Makhlouf contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison de la situation en Syrie – Gel des fonds – Restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Critère de l’“appartenance familiale” – Article 27, paragraphe 2, sous b), et article 28, paragraphe 2, sous b), de la décision 2013/255/PESC – Droits de la défense – Erreur d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Droit de propriété – Liberté de circuler et de séjourner dans les États membres – Droit à la vie familiale – Responsabilité non contractuelle.#Affaire T-388/24.

cjeu_case ·
5234

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to move and reside in the Member States – Right to family life – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-388/24.

cjeu_case ·
5235

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-387/24.

cjeu_case ·
5236

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-387/24.

cjeu_case ·
5237

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-386/24.

cjeu_case ·
5238

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-386/24.

cjeu_case ·
5239

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Target Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing three red and white concentric circles – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-347/24.

cjeu_case ·
5240

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Target Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing three red and white concentric circles – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-347/24.

cjeu_case ·