Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
4981

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 23 July 2025.#European Commission v Ortis SA.#Interim relief – Appeal – Articles 278 and 279 TFEU – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Application for suspension of the effects of provisions of a regulation that have been annulled by the General Court of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 – Prohibition and placing under scrutiny of certain substances and preparations containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives – Regulation (EU) 2021/468 – First and second entries in point 1 and first and second entries in point 2 of Article 1 – Urgency.#Case C-54/25 P-R.

cjeu_case ·
4983

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#FV v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reform of the Staff Regulations of 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain details for calculating pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Members of the auxiliary staff who have become members of the temporary staff – Members of the temporary staff who have become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability.#Case T-533/24.

cjeu_case ·
4984

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#FV v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reform of the Staff Regulations of 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain details for calculating pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Members of the auxiliary staff who have become members of the temporary staff – Members of the temporary staff who have become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability.#Case T-533/24.

cjeu_case ·
4989

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-432/24.

cjeu_case ·
4990

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-432/24.

cjeu_case ·
4995

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 July 2025 (Extracts).#Lattanzio KIBS SpA and Others v European Commission.#Public procurement – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Action for annulment – Lack of direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Criteria for exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures – Concept of ‘final judgment that the person or entity is guilty’ – Article 136(1)(d)(ii) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Persons who have powers of representation, decision or control with regard to a person or entity who is excluded – Article 136(4)(a) of Regulation 2018/1046 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-113/24.

cjeu_case ·
4996

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 July 2025 (Extracts).#Lattanzio KIBS SpA and Others v European Commission.#Public procurement – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Action for annulment – Lack of direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Criteria for exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures – Concept of ‘final judgment that the person or entity is guilty’ – Article 136(1)(d)(ii) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Persons who have powers of representation, decision or control with regard to a person or entity who is excluded – Article 136(4)(a) of Regulation 2018/1046 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-113/24.

cjeu_case ·
4997

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 July 2025 (Extracts).#Lattanzio KIBS SpA and Others v European Commission.#Public procurement – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Action for annulment – Lack of direct concern – Partial inadmissibility – Criteria for exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures – Concept of ‘final judgment that the person or entity is guilty’ – Article 136(1)(d)(ii) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Persons who have powers of representation, decision or control with regard to a person or entity who is excluded – Article 136(4)(a) of Regulation 2018/1046 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-113/24.

cjeu_case ·